Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 40573 - htp-1.15.ebuild (new package)
Summary: htp-1.15.ebuild (new package)
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Web Application Packages Maintainers
Keywords: EBUILD
Depends on:
Reported: 2004-02-06 03:09 UTC by DC
Modified: 2004-06-26 17:37 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

htp-1.15.ebuild (new package) (htp-1.15.ebuild,1.20 KB, text/plain)
2004-02-06 03:10 UTC, DC

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description DC 2004-02-06 03:09:06 UTC
Attached is a new ebuild for Htp, an HTML preprocessor. It's a tool for building websites from templates. From author's description:

"Htp was intended as a HTML pre-processor. It is able to preprocess HTML, XHTML, XML and CSS files (htp could process any text based files). Its purpose is to assist you to maintain a consistent "look" over an entire set of web pages. This is done by allowing you to define your own tags as abbreviations for sets of standard HTML tags."

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Comment 1 DC 2004-02-06 03:10:49 UTC
Created attachment 25068 [details]
htp-1.15.ebuild (new package)
Comment 2 Stuart Herbert (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-04-23 05:16:28 UTC
Package: dev-util/htp

I've committed your ebuild; it should appear on an rsync mirror near you
in about an hour.  Could you test it please, and let me know whether it
works for you?

Comment 3 DC 2004-04-23 14:39:01 UTC
Thanks! I noticed one small problem though: in the ebuild that was committed, a space was remove from the end of the line "StreamPrintF(task->outfile, " which confused patch, making it fail. (It took me a while to notice this difference between the ebuild I submitted and the ebuild that was committed).

This is partially my fault; I should have made the ebuild more robust. If we use "patch -l" instead of just "patch", then patch will know to ignore whitespace, and then the ebuild works great.

BTW, why did you choose to put this ebuild in dev-util? Since it's an HTML processor, I had thought that it belonged in app-text.

Comment 4 Stuart Herbert (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-04-23 15:20:21 UTC
You're right - it does belong in app-text.  Sorry about that.  I've moved it.

Trailing whitespace falls foul of our QA tools.  I've added the -l switch to patch to deal with this.

Best regards,
Comment 5 Stuart Herbert (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-06-26 17:37:45 UTC
Closing old bug.