Bug 40246 – gpdf will not render some symbols properly

• Status: RESOLVED REMIND
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Dice Random 2004-02-02 23:45:42 UTC]

gpdf is not rendering integral and <> symbols properly.  See attached screenshot comparing (proper) display from acroread and (improper) display from gpdf.  Link to the specific PDF file in question is: http://online.redwoods.edu/instruct/darnold/multcalc/thomasproblems/ec_innerproduct_fg.pdf

[Comment 1 Dice Random 2004-02-02 23:46:13 UTC]

Created attachment 24874 [details]
screenshot of improper rendering

[Comment 2 Dice Random 2004-02-03 11:52:11 UTC]

Sorry, forgot to mention that this is using gpdf 0.111

[Comment 3 Alastair Tse (RETIRED) 2004-02-14 08:11:24 UTC]

is there an example pdf you can attach with those problems?

[Comment 4 Dice Random 2004-02-14 10:23:26 UTC]

Created attachment 25607 [details]
This PDF does not render correctly in gpdf 0.111 or 0.112

[Comment 5 Yi Quang (RETIRED) 2004-04-10 11:30:04 UTC]

Can you see if it is fixed in 0.112.1? This bug is fixed in 0.131, but that is not marked ARCH 

[Comment 6 Dice Random 2004-04-10 14:13:29 UTC]

Created attachment 29047 [details]
screenshot of new behavior in 0.131

The integration symbol works in 0.131 but the inner product symbol does not. 
0.112.1 doesn't show either properly.  Note in particular the line "1. <f,f> >=
0 with equality if and only if f = 0".	The comparison symbols "greater than",
"less than", etc. all work fine, these are the inner product symbols which
basically look identical but aren't :)

[Comment 7 foser (RETIRED) 2004-08-18 09:07:20 UTC]

how does 0.132 do ?

I can say this works for me with 2.7.90 (gnome 2.8 pre - not yet in portage), so i'm closing this as remind.

[Comment 8 Dice Random 2004-08-18 10:28:29 UTC]

0.132 does not render the inner product symbols.  It is working correctly for me with BMG's 2.7.90 though.

[Comment 9 foser (RETIRED) 2004-08-19 08:15:04 UTC]

*** Bug 60795 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***