Bug 396857 – Please stabilize =dev-cpp/sptk-4.13-r1 and =dev-cpp/cppserv-0.2.14

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Paweł Hajdan, Jr. (RETIRED) 2012-01-01 22:56:46 UTC]

Is it OK to stabilize =dev-cpp/sptk-4.11 ?

If so, please CC arches and add STABLEREQ keyword.

Stabilization of this package has been repoman-checked on the following arches: x86, amd64

[Comment 1 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. (RETIRED) 2012-02-02 15:59:39 UTC]

Maintainer timeout (30 days). Arches please go ahead.

[Comment 2 Ian Delaney (RETIRED) 2012-02-05 14:21:16 UTC]

builds fine on all flags.  No test suite it seems
amd64 ok

[Comment 3 Ian Delaney (RETIRED) 2012-02-05 18:54:44 UTC]

On second thoughts;

archtester libvisio # USE="aspell fltk" emerge =dev-cpp/sptk-4.11 

make[2]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/sptk4.dir/gui/CEditorSpellChecker.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/sptk4.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2
emake failed
 * ERROR: dev-cpp/sptk-4.11 failed (compile phase):
 * 
 * The following package has failed to build or install:
 * 
 *  (dev-cpp/sptk-4.11::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge), Log file:
archtester libvisio # eix fltk
[U] x11-libs/fltk
     Installed versions:  1.3.0

[Comment 4 Aaron Bauman (RETIRED) 2012-02-05 19:22:14 UTC]

Reproduced the same results as Ian in the above build failure.

[Comment 5 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2012-02-05 19:29:28 UTC]

thanks, I think we have established the breakage by now...

[Comment 6 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2012-02-06 20:10:12 UTC]

Try 4.13 instead

[Comment 7 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2012-02-06 20:11:49 UTC]

And you need to take cppserv-0.2.14 with this

[Comment 8 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2012-02-06 20:14:45 UTC]

err, found another bug (sorry for the noise)

[Comment 9 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2012-02-07 16:38:09 UTC]

Test & stabilize:

=dev-cpp/sptk-4.13-r1
=dev-cpp/cppserv-0.2.14

[Comment 10 Aaron Bauman (RETIRED) 2012-02-08 05:10:12 UTC]

amd64 ok.

[Comment 11 Agostino Sarubbo 2012-02-08 15:03:18 UTC]

bug 341215 is not a regression

[Comment 12 Aaron Bauman (RETIRED) 2012-02-08 15:27:36 UTC]

New tester here.  Didn't realize I should report the QA notice.  Confirmed with Maurizio after retesting.  My apologies.

[Comment 13 Elijah "Armageddon" El Lazkani (amd64 AT) 2012-02-08 16:41:11 UTC]

amd64: @ago +1
       other than that pass...

[Comment 14 Maurizio Camisaschi (amd64 AT) 2012-02-08 18:39:10 UTC]

there is a little problem with g++ called directly for cppserv (Bug 402737) but for everything else amd64 is ok for both

[Comment 15 Agostino Sarubbo 2012-02-08 19:30:26 UTC]

amd64 stable

[Comment 16 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. (RETIRED) 2012-02-24 14:58:58 UTC]

x86 stable, closing