Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 39194 - hammerhead-2.1.3.ebuild
Summary: hammerhead-2.1.3.ebuild
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All All
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Web Application Packages Maintainers
Keywords: EBUILD
Depends on:
Reported: 2004-01-23 13:33 UTC by Brian Downey
Modified: 2004-04-28 16:03 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

hammerhead-2.1.3.ebuild (hammerhead-2.1.3.ebuild,896 bytes, text/plain)
2004-01-23 13:35 UTC, Brian Downey
Patch for ./src/Makefile (hammerhead-2.1.3-Makefile-gentoo.diff,676 bytes, text/plain)
2004-01-23 13:35 UTC, Brian Downey

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Brian Downey 2004-01-23 13:33:44 UTC

Please find the attached ebuild and patch to fix a non-standard Makefile in the source tarball.

Hammerhead is a small easy-to-use load testing tool for websites.  I placed it in net-www/ but I suppose it could be just as nicely categorized elsewhere. 

Comment 1 Brian Downey 2004-01-23 13:35:07 UTC
Created attachment 24312 [details]
Comment 2 Brian Downey 2004-01-23 13:35:48 UTC
Created attachment 24313 [details]
Patch for ./src/Makefile
Comment 3 Brian Downey 2004-01-23 13:48:55 UTC
The patch file name should be "hammerhead-2.1.3-Makefile-gentoo.diff"

Sorry about that!
Comment 4 Stuart Herbert (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-04-23 04:05:32 UTC
Okay, I'm reluctant to add this to Gentoo, because hammerhead looks like an abandoned project.  Do you know if there is anyone actively maintaining this any more?

Comment 5 Brian Downey 2004-04-26 13:21:36 UTC
Yea, it does look abandonded.  I still use it, and figured I would write an ebuild since I'm a Gentoo-head.  But if you have reservations about it not being worked on anymore and not wanting to put it in Portage because of that I wouldn't be crushed :)
Comment 6 Stuart Herbert (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-04-28 16:03:17 UTC
I think we'll pass on this one for now.  But, if there's demand for it in the future, I'll happily reconsider.

Best regards,