Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 38769 - New ebuild for snort_inline-2.1.0
Summary: New ebuild for snort_inline-2.1.0
Status: VERIFIED TEST-REQUEST
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All All
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Netmon Herd
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: EBUILD
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-01-19 19:44 UTC by Patrick McCarty
Modified: 2004-07-17 15:59 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
ebuild for snort_inline-2.1.0 (snort_inline-2.1.0.ebuild,2.81 KB, text/plain)
2004-01-19 19:46 UTC, Patrick McCarty
Details
snort_inline libnet patch (snort_inline-2.1.0-libnet-1.0.patch,6.58 KB, patch)
2004-01-19 19:47 UTC, Patrick McCarty
Details | Diff
snort_inline gcc3 fix, stolen from snort package (snort_inline-2.1.0-gcc3.patch,350 bytes, patch)
2004-01-19 19:48 UTC, Patrick McCarty
Details | Diff
Another patch from snort (snort-drop-calculation.diff,4.84 KB, patch)
2004-01-19 19:48 UTC, Patrick McCarty
Details | Diff
pgsql patch from snort (snort_inline-2.1.0-pgsql.patch,645 bytes, patch)
2004-01-19 19:49 UTC, Patrick McCarty
Details | Diff
confd file for snort_inline (snort_inline.confd,366 bytes, text/plain)
2004-01-19 19:49 UTC, Patrick McCarty
Details
rc6 file for snort_inline (snort_inline.rc6,851 bytes, text/plain)
2004-01-19 19:49 UTC, Patrick McCarty
Details
snort_inline-2.1.0a-r2.ebuild (snort_inline-2.1.0a-r2.ebuild,2.96 KB, text/plain)
2004-03-21 07:29 UTC, Michael Boman (RETIRED)
Details
snort_inline.confd.diff (snort_inline.confd.diff,614 bytes, patch)
2004-03-21 07:30 UTC, Michael Boman (RETIRED)
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Patrick McCarty 2004-01-19 19:44:50 UTC
Hi,

I've created an ebuild file and corresponding patches to make snort_inline-2.1.0 happy with the gentoo environment -- in particular with the way gentoo handles libnet.

I've adapted the ebuild from the snort package (as snort_inline is a modification of snort proper).

Attached is the ebuild, and the necessary patches.
Comment 1 Patrick McCarty 2004-01-19 19:46:41 UTC
Created attachment 24107 [details]
ebuild for snort_inline-2.1.0
Comment 2 Patrick McCarty 2004-01-19 19:47:19 UTC
Created attachment 24108 [details, diff]
snort_inline libnet patch
Comment 3 Patrick McCarty 2004-01-19 19:48:03 UTC
Created attachment 24109 [details, diff]
snort_inline gcc3 fix, stolen from snort package
Comment 4 Patrick McCarty 2004-01-19 19:48:44 UTC
Created attachment 24111 [details, diff]
Another patch from snort
Comment 5 Patrick McCarty 2004-01-19 19:49:06 UTC
Created attachment 24112 [details, diff]
pgsql patch from snort
Comment 6 Patrick McCarty 2004-01-19 19:49:32 UTC
Created attachment 24113 [details]
confd file for snort_inline
Comment 7 Patrick McCarty 2004-01-19 19:49:53 UTC
Created attachment 24114 [details]
rc6 file for snort_inline
Comment 8 Michael Boman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-02-16 09:00:29 UTC
I could build the package and stuff, but I have no equipment to make sure it works as advertised.

I can maintain it in ~x86 if I get the assurance that I get help keeping the software related bugs under controll.

How does that sound?
Comment 9 Michael Boman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-02-16 09:11:33 UTC
BTW: last time I tested snort-inline I needed 'ebtables' in my kernel. It can be found at ebtables.sf.net. Patching gentoo-sources is pretty easy, add one more URL in SRC_URI and modify the UNIPATCH_LIST variable accordingly.

I can also create the ebuild for the userland tools. My biggest problem is that I do not have the skills to fix any software bugs in the kernel or kernel related tools.

BTW: IF we get snort-inline into gentoo it will be it's own package, as it is not your standard snort even if it is based on the snort codebase.
Comment 10 Patrick McCarty 2004-02-16 11:25:06 UTC
I'm willing to help test or integrate changes into the build as necessary.

I would expect this package to be ~86, as it will no doubt require much work to be done by the user to customize to their particular needs anyway. (Hopefully just in the configuration realm however)

Software related bugs most likely will be a result of bugs in Snort, and not in snort-inline itself.

As for bugs in the snort-inline modification, I know we'll get whatever support we need. The lead developer is a great guy.

As for the ebtables patch, I dont recall applying that one specifically, but I do believe you are correct in assuming that it is required for necessary functionality.

Cheers! 
Comment 11 Michael Boman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-02-25 23:38:36 UTC
I'd like to draw the help from the x86-kernel people to incorperate the 'ebtables' kernel patch in at least one of our kernel sources.

Without this patch snort-inline won't work, which makes this request impossible to forfull. Once the patch has been incorperated I'll create ebtables userspace ebuild as well as commiting the snort-inline ebuild.
Comment 12 Michael Boman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-02-28 09:41:58 UTC
Quick update: Saw that solar@g.o have added in the ebtables userspace tools (thanks dude!).

Now we only need a kernel with the ebtables patch applied and then this ebuild can be propperly taken care of ;)
Comment 13 solar (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-02-28 11:36:38 UTC
Please keep me posted on what kernel 2.4.x kernel will have ebtables support. Support should be there by default in 2.6.x for ebtables,arptables
Comment 14 Michael Boman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-03-08 19:20:23 UTC
I have commited net-analyzer/snort_inline 2.1.0a to CVS, and should be available at your local rsync server in about 30 minutes. Please test and report back any success or failure with this ebuild.
Comment 15 Patrick McCarty 2004-03-15 23:41:26 UTC
I've just successfully built the snort_inline package from portage. :)

Unfortunately, the init script seems to require the service "ebtables", which does not have a service startup script aparrently.

ebtables was built as a dependency of snort_inline correctly (seemingly) and shows installed when queried with epm:
# epm -q ebtables
ebtables-2.0.6

This is a fresh build with the 2.6.4-rc1 development sources tree.

One other thing I did notice, which I believe I've seen before is that both libnet-1.0.2a and libnet-1.1 are built even though the dependencies are stated as:
        <net-libs/libnet-1.1
        >=net-libs/libnet-1.0.2a-r3

Another additional issue is that the sed part in the ebuild for changing the rulepath of snort_inline.conf is set incorrectly. Also, it is now taking the snort.conf file as the distrib file, and not snort_inline.conf.

Line from portage:
        sed "s:var RULE_PATH ../rules:var RULE_PATH /etc/snort-inline:" < etc/sn
ort.conf > etc/snort.conf.distrib

From my attachment:
sed "s:var RULE_PATH /etc/snort_inline/drop-rules:var RULE_PATH /etc/snort_inline/rules:" < etc/snort_inline.conf > etc/snort_inline.conf.distrib

snort.conf is different from snort_inline.conf....

Also, I had it putting the rules in /etc/snort_inline/rules for a cleaner /etc hierarchy, I'm not sure if thats necessarily a good thing, and I leave that to someone else to decide, but it does seem cleaner since there can be MANY files there...

I think that's probably plenty of issues for now! :)

Cheers!

-- Patrick
Comment 16 Michael Boman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-03-15 23:49:35 UTC
Seems like we need another go to get this one working...
Comment 17 Michael Boman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-03-16 21:10:05 UTC
Solar: could ebtables get a start/stop script that load/clear/save the ruleset just like iptables does it?
Comment 18 Michael Boman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-03-16 21:59:03 UTC
I've removed the dependency on ebtables service, as it doesn't yet exist.

regarding the libnet beeing built twice.. It's a portage dependency calculation bug IMHO. I'll check with the portage guys to see if it has a propper solution.

Regarding the PATH's choosen:

I'd like to keep the snort_inline ebuild as close to snort vanilla ebuild to simplify maintainence. The vanilla snort ebuild put the rules in /etc/snort long before it landed in my lap, and I am quite sure that there are a few people that counts on the specific location.

That said, /etc/{snort,snort_inline}/rules is much cleaner and I'll investigate how to move the rules for vanilla snort w/o breaking too much. Snort_inline does not have this legacy problem so I'll fix that one right away ;)

Also, I'll update snort_inline to 2.1.1 once the ebuild is sorted out (should be a simple version bump away).

So, again please try the new ebuild out (net-analyzer/snort_inline-2.1.0a-r1).. It should hit the rsync mirrors in 30 minutes or so..
Comment 19 Patrick McCarty 2004-03-17 00:07:05 UTC
Sweetness, I got it running this time..

Couple more minor bugs though:

1) /etc/conf.d/snort_inline has snort_inline running as the user "snort", but our ebuild creates the user "snort_inline

Line:
SNORT_OPTS="-D -Q -u snort -l $LOGDIR -c $CONF"

Should be:
SNORT_OPTS="-D -Q -u snort_inline -l $LOGDIR -c $CONF"

2) reference.config and classification.config in the snort_inline distributed config are being looked for in $RULE_PATH/blah.config, but they are in just /etc/snort_inline instead of /etc/snort_inline/rules

The other option obviously is to change the snort_inline.conf.distrib:
Old:
# Include classification & priority settings
include $RULE_PATH/classification.config
include $RULE_PATH/reference.config
New:
# Include classification & priority settings
include classification.config
include reference.config

Probably could be done with a sed line much like the RULE_PATH in the ebuild, but whatever works :)

Well, those weren't too bad.. were they? Yay, working snort_inline...

Happy snorting!

-- Patrick
Comment 20 solar (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-03-17 13:11:09 UTC
Re: ebtables init scripts

I'm not sure about this. iptables has /sbin/iptables-{save,restore} and
ebtables has nothing like this.

Perhaps with a little work and some c loving one could barrow the code 
and make it work for ebtables (maybe). My plate is pretty full now so I 
don't think I'll be exploring that however patches are welcome.
Comment 21 Michael Boman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-03-17 13:22:33 UTC
Solar:
       ebtables [-t table] [--atomic-file file] --atomic-commit
       ebtables [-t table] [--atomic-file file] --atomic-init
       ebtables [-t table] [--atomic-file file] --atomic-save


basically, take iptabes init script, replace 'iptables-save' with 'ebtables --atomic-file /path/to/ebtables.rules --atomic-save' and iptables-restore with 'ebtables --atomic-file /path/to/ebtables.rules --atomic-commit' 
Comment 22 Michael Boman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-03-21 07:29:16 UTC
Created attachment 27735 [details]
snort_inline-2.1.0a-r2.ebuild

Please test this ebuild out. It should fix the last reported errors.
Comment 23 Michael Boman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-03-21 07:30:21 UTC
Created attachment 27736 [details, diff]
snort_inline.confd.diff

Diff file for files/snort_inline.confd
Comment 24 solar (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-03-21 08:53:30 UTC
Re #21
Seeing as your requesting this, and you already know exactly what needs to 
be done. Feel free to do it yourself bud.
Comment 25 Patrick McCarty 2004-03-27 17:33:58 UTC
This patch/ebuild does indeed seem to address every problem I've seen :)

Sorry I took so long to check this out, my hard drive decided it wanted to take a permanent vacation. (fun)

Thanks for your hard work!
Comment 26 Patrick McCarty 2004-07-17 15:59:18 UTC
Closing bug...