Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 37990 - pixinto and dopix
Summary: pixinto and dopix
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Portage Development
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Enhancement/Feature Requests (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Portage team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-01-12 11:11 UTC by Marcel J. P. Möhring
Modified: 2007-02-17 04:18 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
dopix script (dopix,270 bytes, text/plain)
2004-01-12 11:13 UTC, Marcel J. P. Möhring
Details
patch against ebuild.sh (ebuild.sh.patch,883 bytes, patch)
2004-01-12 11:16 UTC, Marcel J. P. Möhring
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Marcel J. P. Möhring 2004-01-12 11:11:56 UTC
Similar to docinto and dopix, just for pixmaps in /usr/share/pixmaps/
dopix and ebuild.sh.patch for ebuild.sh from portage version 2.0.49-r21


Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Comment 1 Marcel J. P. Möhring 2004-01-12 11:13:38 UTC
Created attachment 23686 [details]
dopix script
Comment 2 Marcel J. P. Möhring 2004-01-12 11:16:04 UTC
Created attachment 23687 [details, diff]
patch against ebuild.sh
Comment 3 Jason Stubbs (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-28 07:24:45 UTC
Putting a hold on feature requests for portage as they are drowning out the 
bugs. Most of these features should be available in the next major version of 
portage. But for the time being, they are just drowning out the major bugs and 
delaying the next version's progress. 
 
Any bugs that contain patches and any bugs for etc-update or dispatch-conf can 
be reopened. Sorry, I'm just not good enough with bugzilla. ;) 
Comment 4 Marius Mauch (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-11 12:35:25 UTC
Reopening for consideration.
Comment 5 Marius Mauch (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-02-17 04:18:56 UTC
Apparently there isn't much interest in this (and personally I'm not a fan of the trivial do* wrappers)