Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 378721 - Prefix support for gnome-extra/nautilus-dropbox broken since v0.6.7-r2
Summary: Prefix support for gnome-extra/nautilus-dropbox broken since v0.6.7-r2
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo/Alt
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Prefix Support (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Markos Chandras (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: prefix-gx86 378719
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2011-08-10 23:06 UTC by Dan Wallis
Modified: 2012-08-23 03:17 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Proposed patch (nautilus-dropbox-prefix-support.patch,850 bytes, text/plain)
2011-08-10 23:06 UTC, Dan Wallis 		Details
Proposed patch (nautilus-dropbox.diff,569 bytes, patch)
2012-08-23 02:24 UTC, Dan Wallis 		Details | Diff
Show Obsolete (1) View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Dan Wallis 2011-08-10 23:06:36 UTC 
Created attachment 282889 [details]
Proposed patch

Due to the changes in bug 376709, gnome-extra/nautilus-dropbox-0.6.7-r2 no longer works in prefix. :(

Attached patch resolves the issue for me.
Comment 1 Fabian Groffen gentoo-dev 2011-08-14 19:41:10 UTC 
this package seems to be no longer in the tree
Comment 3 Christoph Junghans (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-08-22 15:33:38 UTC 
Instead of replacing the path by @GENTOO_PORTAGE_EPREFIX@ and then by ${EPREFIX} (done by eprefixify), one should do it directly in one step. (and no need to inherit prefix eclass).

@hwoarang: It the change otherwise ok with you?
Comment 4 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2012-08-22 16:01:35 UTC 
Actually, I'm confused by this bug report since the latest version already has prefix support (~x86-linux). RESO:OBSOLETE/TEST-REQUEST ??
Comment 5 Christoph Junghans (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-08-22 16:13:22 UTC 
(In reply to comment #4)
> Actually, I'm confused by this bug report since the latest version already
> has prefix support (~x86-linux). RESO:OBSOLETE/TEST-REQUEST ??
True, but no ${EPREFIX}/opt/dropbox/dropboxd in dropbox.in!
Comment 6 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2012-08-22 16:29:52 UTC 
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Actually, I'm confused by this bug report since the latest version already
> > has prefix support (~x86-linux). RESO:OBSOLETE/TEST-REQUEST ??
> True, but no ${EPREFIX}/opt/dropbox/dropboxd in dropbox.in!

Ok, then someone needs to make this bug relevant and not talk about such an old version!
Comment 7 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-08-22 16:51:23 UTC 
(In reply to comment #3)
> Instead of replacing the path by @GENTOO_PORTAGE_EPREFIX@ and then by
> ${EPREFIX} (done by eprefixify), one should do it directly in one step. (and
> no need to inherit prefix eclass).
> 
> @hwoarang: It the change otherwise ok with you?

Feel free to do whatever change in necessary
Comment 8 Dan Wallis 2012-08-23 02:24:11 UTC 
Created attachment 321982 [details, diff]
Proposed patch

(In reply to comment #3)
> Instead of replacing the path by @GENTOO_PORTAGE_EPREFIX@ and then by
> ${EPREFIX} (done by eprefixify), one should do it directly in one step. (and
> no need to inherit prefix eclass).

Great, thanks. I hadn't realised that variable was available within ebuilds. :)

(In reply to comment #6)
> Ok, then someone needs to make this bug relevant and not talk about such an
> old version!

This patch is against v1.4.0, but it would be nice if this bug could be fixed on all versions. I'll update the $SUMMARY shortly.
Comment 9 Christoph Junghans (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-08-23 03:17:07 UTC 
Added, thanks.