Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 373491 - Stabilize =sys-kernel/tuxonice-sources-2.6.38-r1
Summary: Stabilize =sys-kernel/tuxonice-sources-2.6.38-r1
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Keywording and Stabilization (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Krzysztof Pawlik (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: STABLEREQ
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-06-29 18:22 UTC by Krzysztof Pawlik (RETIRED)
Modified: 2011-11-10 17:25 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Krzysztof Pawlik (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-06-29 18:22:54 UTC
Please test and stabilize =sys-kernel/tuxonice-sources-2.6.38-r1. Testing involves running the kernel for some time and using suspend to ram/disk a few times. System should come back without any issues.
Comment 1 Ian Delaney (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-06-30 16:22:37 UTC
amd64:

I use hibernate as the norm, though I cannot get the hibernate cmd to work.

archtester testuser # hibernate
/usr/share/hibernate/scriptlets.d/tuxonice: line 525: echo: write error: Device or resource busy.

However, s2ram -f and the other CL options all work AOK, and system returns perfectly.
Comment 2 Ian Delaney (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-06-30 17:45:00 UTC
"suspend to ram/disk a few times".

Similarly, 

archtester testuser # pm-hibernate
archtester testuser # pm-hibernate --suspend

both achieve nothing.  

# echo mem > /sys/power/state

invokes suspend to ram.

# echo disk > /sys/power/state

results in nothing. I can't find a solution to get supsend to disk in any form to work, but I suspect it's not the tux kernel.
Comment 3 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-07-02 15:31:39 UTC
the tuxonice patches work perfectly for me. amd64 done
Comment 4 schmitt953 2011-08-23 23:49:10 UTC
I know you are probably aware but there are power consumption issues in 2.6.38, have they been addressed in tuxonice as tuxonice users are probably concerned about battery life? If not we may want to remask it so that people know it'll eat up their battery.
Comment 5 stefan 2011-11-05 07:13:11 UTC
Don't know if the issue still remains, but just following Pawel's call at gentoo.org. I have two machines (x86 and amd64) both running tuxonice 2.6.38-r2 for some time now without any problems. I updated the amd64 machine recently to 3.0.6 and I did not see any problems either, besides the laptop-mode issue.

cheers
Comment 6 A Schenck 2011-11-10 06:36:08 UTC
I recall 2.6.38 being reasonably stable, though I've moved on to 3.0.7 on the laptop and I'm using zen-sources for reiser4 on the desktop.  Unlike Ian, I don't use suspend to ram and always use hibernate, to a file on the root partition which I identify by UUID in the kernel command line.  I didn't have much trouble with that configuration.  3.0+ kernels have issues with nuking USB URBs (or something like that) which disables all USB devices until next reboot, but <3.0 was fine with that.  I'm on ~x86, with a core i5 on the laptop.  I've never noticed power consumption issues because I keep it plugged in all the time, though I couldn't get the KMS intel drivers working until 3.0+ (which may have been because I didn't enable the backlight drivers).
Comment 7 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-11-10 17:25:39 UTC
x86 stable, closing, thanks for testing