Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 36016 - Changes to gzip ebuild to allow use of icc
Summary: Changes to gzip ebuild to allow use of icc
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-12-17 12:11 UTC by Svein Erik Brostigen
Modified: 2004-01-03 08:46 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
Patch to enable gzip to use icc (gzip-1.3.3-r2.ebuild.diff,668 bytes, patch)
2003-12-17 12:12 UTC, Svein Erik Brostigen
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Svein Erik Brostigen 2003-12-17 12:11:34 UTC
I have attached a diff against the gzip-1.3.3-r2.ebuild to allow use of icc.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Comment 1 Svein Erik Brostigen 2003-12-17 12:12:02 UTC
Created attachment 22375 [details, diff]
Patch to enable gzip to use icc
Comment 2 Jon Portnoy (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-01-02 01:57:24 UTC
In the past it's been determined that the most efficient way to enable ICC support would be either to modify gcc-config to be capable of switching to ICC, or modify Portage itself to deal with it; spyderous had some discussions with einride and Zadeh about this
Comment 3 Donnie Berkholz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-01-02 11:12:09 UTC
As I mentioned on another of these ICC bugs (which vapier ignored me on), the only necessary thing to do is respect CC. For packages that already do so and compile fine with it (such as gzip), nothing is necessary.

Whenever there's a patch needed for ICC to work, instead of 'use icc', what should happen (IMHO) is:

if [ "${CC}" = "icc" ]
then
    apply icc patches, do icc stuff
fi

Since CC will be set to icc by (g)cc-config.
Comment 4 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2004-01-03 08:46:43 UTC
i didnt ignore you on it persay ;)
i thought i backed up my reasoning semi well