Bug 353035 – bump openoffice ebuilds to eapi3

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Theo Chatzimichos (RETIRED) 2011-01-28 10:35:42 UTC]

the upcoming eclasses will support >eapi3. I'm attaching a preliminary patch

[Comment 1 Theo Chatzimichos (RETIRED) 2011-01-28 10:37:05 UTC]

Created attachment 260909 [details, diff]
eapi3 patch

correction in previous comment, >=eapi3

[Comment 2 Theo Chatzimichos (RETIRED) 2011-01-28 10:37:41 UTC]

CC'ing Jonathan to help

[Comment 3 Andreas Proschofsky (RETIRED) 2011-01-28 10:43:08 UTC]

(In reply to comment #0)
> the upcoming eclasses will support >eapi3. I'm attaching a preliminary patch
> 

Could you elaborate a bit? Which "upcoming eclasses" are you talking about?

[Comment 4 Theo Chatzimichos (RETIRED) 2011-01-28 10:47:41 UTC]

the ones that are currently in kde overlay

[Comment 5 Andreas Proschofsky (RETIRED) 2011-01-28 11:32:03 UTC]

(In reply to comment #4)
> the ones that are currently in kde overlay
> 

For what, which eclasses in particular? Why is this relevant for OOo? Please try to give some info, it's a bit annoying to have to guess what this bug is actually about.

[Comment 6 Theo Chatzimichos (RETIRED) 2011-01-28 11:42:49 UTC]

In short, kde4-* eclasses are going to require EAPI 3. I am trying to bump to EAPI 3 all ebuilds that inherit those eclasses, openoffice being one of them. So, this bug is about bumping ooo ebuilds to EAPI 3, so I can move the eclasses from the kde overlay to tree.
The overlay eclasses also have more changes apart from the eapi, but they don't affect ooo.

[Comment 7 Andreas Proschofsky (RETIRED) 2011-01-28 11:51:11 UTC]

Thanks, now that makes sense :-)

[Comment 8 Jonathan Callen (RETIRED) 2011-01-29 06:59:13 UTC]

Created attachment 260966 [details, diff]
New patch, also add prefix support

If we're going to move to EAPI=3, might as well try to get prefix support included as well :).

[Comment 9 Jonathan Callen (RETIRED) 2011-01-29 06:59:37 UTC]

Created attachment 260968 [details, diff]
Patch for 3.2.1-r1

[Comment 10 Jonathan Callen (RETIRED) 2011-01-29 07:00:23 UTC]

Created attachment 260970 [details, diff]
install to configured paths

[Comment 11 Fabian Groffen 2011-01-29 10:19:20 UTC]

perhaps we should just focus on libreoffice instead?

[Comment 12 Andreas Proschofsky (RETIRED) 2011-01-29 19:35:30 UTC]

(In reply to comment #11)
> perhaps we should just focus on libreoffice instead?
> 

I agree about that, at least my focus will be totally on libreoffice. So there won't be any more new releases for app-office/openoffice, at least for the time being I'll do updates for openoffice-bin, but that's it.

If you wonder why: Libreoffice is actually the successor to the ooo-build-based openoffice we have in portage right now, so we didn't have a "vanilla" openoffice for quite some time anyway. (and openoffice without ooo-build is pure hell to build)

[Comment 13 Jonathan Callen (RETIRED) 2011-02-01 23:37:42 UTC]

Speaking with my KDE hat, you at least need to just bump the EAPI of all ebuilds for app-office/openoffice to 3 because kde4-base.eclass will soon die if that is not set, AIUI.

[Comment 14 Andreas Proschofsky (RETIRED) 2011-02-05 10:47:27 UTC]

just fixed this in cvs, thanks for the help! Closing.

[Comment 15 Andreas Proschofsky (RETIRED) 2011-02-05 11:28:03 UTC]

Really closing ;-)