Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 352259 - =dev-java/groovy-1.7.10: Version bump
Summary: =dev-java/groovy-1.7.10: Version bump
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement with 1 vote (vote)
Assignee: Java team
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Relea...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 389383
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2011-01-20 17:50 UTC by ScytheMan
Modified: 2012-01-30 11:05 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description ScytheMan 2011-01-20 17:50:27 UTC
Please bump version.

Thanks in advance.
Comment 4 Jean-Noël Rivasseau (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-03-17 15:23:32 UTC
To build it, an update to QDox is needed. Will see if I can do it.
Comment 5 Jean-Noël Rivasseau (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-05-09 07:11:04 UTC
I've done the Qdox update, so progress is being made here.
Comment 6 Jean-Philippe Robichaud 2011-05-11 13:04:54 UTC
I'm not trying to hijack this bug, but will a groovy 1.7.10 ebuild be a good base for groovy 1.8.0?  I tried to create a simple groovy 1.8 ebuild but got bunches of access violation errors...
Comment 7 Jean-Noël Rivasseau (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-07-21 16:28:05 UTC
Bumped for 1.7.10 done for x86; other arches have to wait for keywording on byaccj / qdox.

As far as 1.8 is concerned, I have not tested yet, but yes, this new ebuild should be a good base.
Comment 8 ScytheMan 2011-09-05 21:14:55 UTC
so if the requested version is in the tree,
should we close the bug or change it into a groovy-1.8.2 bump request? :]
Comment 9 ScytheMan 2011-11-03 01:45:30 UTC
dev-java/groovy-1.7.10 compiles fine on amd64. I didn't need qdox, cause of -doc. So this is untested.
Comment 10 ScytheMan 2012-01-02 23:22:30 UTC
After bug #389383 is fixed, can you rekeyword groovy on amd64 or should I open a new bug for that issue?
Comment 11 Ralph Sennhauser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-01-30 11:05:21 UTC
Closing as 1.8.5 is already in tree with ~amd64 keyword back, so nothing left to do here.