Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 351554 - app-portage/epm-1.33 should resolve relative paths / symlinks
Summary: app-portage/epm-1.33 should resolve relative paths / symlinks
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 93843
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: No maintainer - Look at https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers if you want to take care of it
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-01-13 13:54 UTC by norbert kamenicky
Modified: 2013-01-23 11:58 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description norbert kamenicky 2011-01-13 13:54:47 UTC 
epm-1.33 gives false result "is not owned by any package", if logical path is used:

$ epm -qf /usr/lib/libpam.so
file /usr/lib/libpam.so is not owned by any package

$ epm -qf /usr/lib64/libpam.so
pam-1.1.3

i.e. it needs patch for logical -> physical path conversion

Reproducible: Always

Actual Results:
Comment 1 Paul Varner (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-12-26 20:43:05 UTC 
Reassigning to maintainer-needed since package was not being maintained by anyone in tools-portage herd.
Comment 2 Peter Weilbacher 2013-01-23 11:52:55 UTC 
The problem demonstrated in comment 0 is actually fixed by the patch I just added to bug 93843:

$ epm -qf /usr/lib/libpam.so     # this is epm-1.33
file /usr/lib/libpam.so is not owned by any package
$ ./epm -qf /usr/lib/libpam.so   # this is the patched epm
pam-1.1.5

Would love to mark this as dupe of bug 93843 but apparently I don't have the rights to do that.
Comment 3 Sergey Popov gentoo-dev 2013-01-23 11:58:40 UTC 
(In reply to comment #2)
> Would love to mark this as dupe of bug 93843 but apparently I don't have the
> rights to do that.

Done ;-)

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 93843 ***