Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 325845 - Stabilize =dev-util/cmake-2.8.1-r2
Summary: Stabilize =dev-util/cmake-2.8.1-r2
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo KDE team
Depends on: sandbox-macrovision
  Show dependency tree
Reported: 2010-06-27 15:40 UTC by Andrew Brouwers
Modified: 2010-09-11 15:15 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Andrew Brouwers 2010-06-27 15:40:31 UTC
2.8.x has seemed mostly harmless on my machines, and been in the tree for a while without many interesting bugs.  Newer version as stable would be nice :-)

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-06-30 07:11:10 UTC
10:09 <scarabeus> ssuominen: why not, give it green :]

Arch's, please test & stabilize:

=dev-util/cmake-2.8.1-r2 "alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 ppc ppc64 s390 sh sparc x86"
Comment 2 Jeremy Murphy 2010-07-01 02:24:55 UTC
Fails tests 34 and 106 on x86, see bug #326387.
Comment 3 Thomas Kahle (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-07-01 06:20:40 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Fails tests 34 and 106 on x86, see bug #326387.

Is this also the case with the current stable? If yes, and no other issues arise, we can proceed with stabeling since only regressions block. 
Comment 4 Jeremy Murphy 2010-07-01 11:53:50 UTC
OK, so test numbers don't hold between versions.  CTest.UpdateCVS fails in both the current stable 2.6.4-r3 and 2.8.1-r2.  OutDir is a new test, which fails.  
Comment 5 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-07-04 12:06:47 UTC
ppc64 stable
Comment 6 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-07-06 21:58:28 UTC
amd64 done
Comment 7 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-07-09 20:16:09 UTC
Same test failures as Jeremy on x86...please fix.
Comment 8 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-07-27 02:15:43 UTC
Stable for HPPA PPC.
Comment 9 Thomas Kahle (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-08-03 12:08:41 UTC
(In reply to comment #7)
> Same test failures as Jeremy on x86...please fix.

Hi, I'm proposing a solution in bug 315223. Please test. 
Comment 10 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-08-06 14:26:37 UTC
stable x86, thanks Thomas and Jeremy
Comment 11 Serhij S. Stasyuk 2010-08-11 10:09:17 UTC
cmake-2.8.1.tar.gz downloaded from has different size comparing to Manifest:

>>> Downloading ''
--2010-08-11 12:58:55--
Connecting to||:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 3605586 (3.4M) [application/x-gzip]
Saving to: `/usr/portage/distfiles/cmake-2.8.1.tar.gz'

100%[=====================================================================================>] 3 605 586    644K/s   in 6,7s    

2010-08-11 12:59:02 (522 KB/s) - `/usr/portage/distfiles/cmake-2.8.1.tar.gz' saved [3605586/3605586]

('Filesize does not match recorded size', 3605586, 3605611)
!!! Fetched file: cmake-2.8.1.tar.gz VERIFY FAILED!
!!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size
!!! Got:      3605586
!!! Expected: 3605611
Comment 12 Thomas Kahle (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-08-11 11:32:41 UTC
(In reply to comment #11)
> cmake-2.8.1.tar.gz downloaded from
> has different size comparing
> to Manifest:

Why do you download from
Just delete /usr/portage/distfiles/cmake* and let portage get it from the gentoo mirrors.
Comment 13 Markus Meier gentoo-dev 2010-08-11 21:57:33 UTC
arm stable
Comment 14 Serhij S. Stasyuk 2010-08-12 09:19:15 UTC
In reply to ~12:

Please, check ebuild:
SRC_URI="$(get_version_component_range 1-2)/${MY_P}.tar.gz"

Either I do not have tarball at all or remove it, it will be downloaded from:
1) locally configured mirrors

In any case, why in portage mirrors we have file that differs from original?
Comment 15 Thomas Kahle (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-08-12 11:20:38 UTC
(In reply to comment #14)

> In any case, why in portage mirrors we have file that differs from original?

Most probably because upstream changed the tarball (after it was mirrored by Gentoo) without making a new release.

If you want you can file a separate bug about this issue, however this one is a tracker for stabilization. 
Comment 16 Serhij S. Stasyuk 2010-08-16 09:59:45 UTC
Maybe this bug should depends on #322767?
Comment 17 Tobias Klausmann (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-09-10 13:55:38 UTC
Stable on alpha.
Comment 18 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-09-11 15:15:10 UTC
ia64/s390/sh/sparc stable, closing