Thomas Kahle spotted this flaw in the devmanual and I prepared a patch, which will follow.
Created attachment 224023 [details, diff] Explain that use.local.desc is regenerated manually
(In reply to comment #1) > Created an attachment (id=224023) [details] > Explain that use.local.desc is regenerated manually It still says (in line 135): "All USE flags must be described in either use.desc or use.local.desc". Shouldn't the word "either" be dropped, if we want to allow local USE flag descriptions to supersede global ones? See also discussion in bug 235708.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 273607 ***
Damn, yes, ulm, you are right. It should. Have no time for this today or tomorrow.
*** Bug 273607 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Created attachment 224987 [details, diff] Updated patch Revised patch.
I'd made more clear that in case USE flag is describe both in use.desc and metadata.xml these descriptions should not contradict each other and that global USE flag descript still applies even in such case. Also note bug 235708 (that I closed right now).
some version of this was committed. http://sources.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=devmanual.git;a=commit;h=a3b5a189862d7cc74a5f3676988048953c502933 I'll close this bug then even though I'm not in QA team.