Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 308973 - [gnome-overlay] x11-libs/gtkglext breaks badly with x11-libs/gtk+-2.19.6
Summary: [gnome-overlay] x11-libs/gtkglext breaks badly with x11-libs/gtk+-2.19.6
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: gtk+-2.20
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2010-03-11 12:29 UTC by Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED)
Modified: 2010-03-14 22:32 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
Tentative patch (gtkglext-1.2.0+gtk+-2.19.patch,2.57 KB, patch)
2010-03-11 12:45 UTC, Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED)
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-03-11 12:29:12 UTC
* gtkglwidget.c:177: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘GTK_WIDGET_TOPLEVEL’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

The problem is that with this implicitly declared, it introduces an undefined symbol inside the shared object… and that breaks it entirely.

Will come up with a patch in a few minutes, minus catastrophes…
Comment 1 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-03-11 12:45:55 UTC
Created attachment 223143 [details, diff]
Tentative patch

Needs eautoreconf of course, as it is.

Basically it's the usual *_DISABLE_DEPRECATED stuff… iirc this should be disabled for user-provided packages (thus, Gentoo packages), is that right?
Comment 2 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-03-11 13:43:04 UTC
this is correct, also a non-eautoreconf solution is prefered if the package doesn't do it already for some other reason.
Comment 3 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-03-14 22:32:01 UTC
+  14 Mar 2010; Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@gentoo.org> gtkglext-1.2.0.ebuild:
+  Remove active deprecation definitions, bug #308973.

Thanks for reporting.