301058 – dev-db/sqlite-3.6.22: libsqlite3.so isnt properly linked

Bug 301058 - dev-db/sqlite-3.6.22: libsqlite3.so isnt properly linked

Summary: dev-db/sqlite-3.6.22: libsqlite3.so isnt properly linked

Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 300836

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	High normal (vote)
Assignee:	Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED)

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Duplicates (3):	301422 301439 301571 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2010-01-15 06:15 UTC by Alexis Ballier
Modified:	2010-01-20 22:22 UTC (History)
CC List:	5 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Alexis Ballier gentoo-dev

2010-01-15 06:15:40 UTC

$ gcc foo.c -lsqlite3
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.2/../../../../lib64/libsqlite3.so: undefined reference to `dlsym'
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.2/../../../../lib64/libsqlite3.so: undefined reference to `dlerror'
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.2/../../../../lib64/libsqlite3.so: undefined reference to `dlopen'
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.2/../../../../lib64/libsqlite3.so: undefined reference to `dlclose'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status


this breaks, eg, ocaml-sqlite3 build.

Comment 1 Martin Väth 2010-01-15 19:38:32 UTC

This is a dupe of bug 300836 (and several others), but the only one
with the correct summary in title...

Comment 2 Alexis Ballier gentoo-dev

2010-01-18 20:26:27 UTC

*** Bug 301422 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-01-18 21:24:45 UTC

*** Bug 301439 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-01-19 10:33:45 UTC

Can this be fixed by 300145#c7?

Comment 5 David Abbott (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-01-19 20:46:45 UTC

*** Bug 301571 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Rafał Mużyło 2010-01-20 12:53:23 UTC

(In reply to comment #1)
> This is a dupe of bug 300836 (and several others), but the only one
> with the correct summary in title...
> 

In that case, for the sake of simplicity...

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 300836 ***