286090 – >=app-admin/eselect-1.2 dependency for xorg-1.6 stabilization

Bug 286090 - >=app-admin/eselect-1.2 dependency for xorg-1.6 stabilization

Summary: >=app-admin/eselect-1.2 dependency for xorg-1.6 stabilization

Status:	RESOLVED FIXED

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	[OLD] Unspecified (show other bugs)
Hardware:	x86 Linux

Importance:	High normal (vote)
Assignee:	Gentoo eselect Team

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Duplicates (1):	286136 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:	282290
	Show dependency tree

Reported:	2009-09-23 14:24 UTC by Roland Ramthun
Modified:	2009-09-24 06:10 UTC (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Roland Ramthun 2009-09-23 14:24:15 UTC

I just tried to upgrade with the list http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=205001&action=view of the xorg-server-1.6.3 stabilization bug #282290 - there is one dependency missing:

!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ">=app-admin/eselect-1.2" have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request:
- app-admin/eselect-1.2.3 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)
- app-admin/eselect-1.2.1 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)

(dependency required by "app-admin/eselect-opengl-1.0.8-r1" [ebuild])
(dependency required by "media-libs/mesa-7.5.1" [ebuild])
(dependency required by "media-libs/glew-1.5.1" [ebuild])

Comment 1 Roland Ramthun 2009-09-23 17:24:36 UTC

After keywording app-admin/eselect-1.2.3 the whole upgrade went fine (stable x86, radeon, evdev)

Comment 2 Rémi Cardona (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-09-23 20:03:39 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. It's a legitimate issue.

@eselect team, what say you?

Thanks

Comment 3 Rémi Cardona (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-09-23 20:08:14 UTC

*** Bug 286136 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Tomáš Chvátal (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-09-23 20:21:27 UTC

 
As i said in mail, eselect-opengl dep can be lowered. I just didnt test it so
if anyone will prove that 1.1 is sufficent we should just lower the dep i
guess.

Comment 5 Ulrich Müller gentoo-dev

2009-09-23 22:11:02 UTC

(In reply to comment #4)
> As i said in mail, eselect-opengl dep can be lowered. I just didnt test it
> so if anyone will prove that 1.1 is sufficent we should just lower the dep
> i guess.

It would surprise me if the opengl module didn't work with eselect-1.1.3. There should be no incompatible changes.

If absolutely necessary, we could go for early stabilisation of eselect-1.2.3, but I'd like to give that version two weeks at least (so not before 2009-10-04).

Comment 6 Rémi Cardona (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-09-24 06:10:49 UTC

Alright then, I've lowered the dep. I'll upload a new list on the tracker.

Thanks! :)