Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 282150 - app-doc/doxygen-1.5.8-r1: have dot generate eps instead of ps
Summary: app-doc/doxygen-1.5.8-r1: have dot generate eps instead of ps
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All All
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Steve Arnold
URL: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cg...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-08-20 21:13 UTC by Martin von Gagern
Modified: 2009-08-25 07:42 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
Use -Teps instead of -Tps (dot-eps.patch,2.15 KB, patch)
2009-08-20 21:15 UTC, Martin von Gagern
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Martin von Gagern 2009-08-20 21:13:12 UTC
Doxygen does invoke dot with -Tps to generate files which it stores as *.eps. Current versions for media-gfx/graphviz do support a dedicated -Teps flag to produce Encapsulates PostScript. This has the benefit of avoiding bug #282129.

According to the ChangeLog the flag is present since 2.20.0 from 2008-06-20, so all unmasked graphviz versions in portage should work, although it would still make sense to bump the dependency in the ebuild from 2.6 to 2.20.

The issue doesn't seem to be resolved in the current trunk sources, so this fix is needed even when doxygen gets bumped to 1.6.0, as bug #269961 requests.

I'll attach a patch and try to report the thing upstream as well.
Comment 1 Martin von Gagern 2009-08-20 21:15:17 UTC
Created attachment 201816 [details, diff]
Use -Teps instead of -Tps
Comment 2 Martin von Gagern 2009-08-20 21:28:54 UTC
Reported upstream as http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=592516
Comment 3 Steve Arnold archtester gentoo-dev 2009-08-25 06:36:13 UTC
1.5.9 is now the latest ~arch, and uses the -Teps patch (along with 1.6.0, which is currently masked).  Okay to close?
Comment 4 Martin von Gagern 2009-08-25 07:42:49 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> Okay to close?

Sure. Thanks!