280173 – www-servers/lighttpd and php - use EAPI2 for dependency-checks to check cgi-useflag for php

Bug 280173 - www-servers/lighttpd and php - use EAPI2 for dependency-checks to check cgi-useflag for php

Summary: www-servers/lighttpd and php - use EAPI2 for dependency-checks to check cgi-u...

Status:	RESOLVED CANTFIX

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	High normal (vote)
Assignee:	Christian Hoffmann (RETIRED)

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2009-08-03 12:48 UTC by Marcel Pennewiß
Modified:	2009-08-23 19:55 UTC (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
lighttpd-1.4.20.ebuild.patch (lighttpd-1.4.20.ebuild.patch,842 bytes, patch) 2009-08-03 12:48 UTC, Marcel Pennewiß	Details \| Diff
lighttpd-1.4.22-r1.ebuild.patch (lighttpd-1.4.22-r1.ebuild.patch,805 bytes, patch) 2009-08-03 12:48 UTC, Marcel Pennewiß	Details \| Diff
lighttpd-1.4.23.ebuild.patch (lighttpd-1.4.23.ebuild.patch,799 bytes, patch) 2009-08-03 12:49 UTC, Marcel Pennewiß	Details \| Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Marcel Pennewiß 2009-08-03 12:48:16 UTC

EAPI2 allows to check useflag-dependencies and so portage will show the requirements after calculating dependies. see ebuild-patches as attachment

Comment 1 Marcel Pennewiß 2009-08-03 12:48:43 UTC

Created attachment 200013 [details, diff]
lighttpd-1.4.20.ebuild.patch

Comment 2 Marcel Pennewiß 2009-08-03 12:48:57 UTC

Created attachment 200014 [details, diff]
lighttpd-1.4.22-r1.ebuild.patch

Comment 3 Marcel Pennewiß 2009-08-03 12:49:16 UTC

Created attachment 200016 [details, diff]
lighttpd-1.4.23.ebuild.patch

Comment 4 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester

2009-08-09 04:03:03 UTC

yea, the ebuilds are already EAPI=2 compliant. The built_with_use check should be avoided unless there is something that I'm not seeing.

Comment 5 Thilo Bangert (RETIRED) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-08-09 05:04:09 UTC

we did use USE-based deps, but were told that it can't be used reliably with virtuals. see also bug #260174

i dont have access to the mail from the developer telling me, it's illegal, but i'll investigate as soon as i am back (ping me at the beginning of sept, if needs be).

if it is infact legal to use USE-based deps with virtuals, then this may be committed by whoever feels comfortable enough to stand by it ;-)

thanks

Comment 6 Marcel Pennewiß 2009-08-10 07:41:57 UTC

(In reply to comment #5)
> we did use USE-based deps, but were told that it can't be used reliably with
> virtuals. see also bug #260174
> 
> i dont have access to the mail from the developer telling me, it's illegal

i did not found any mail on the dev-list about this issue. i've tested this and it works fine. did anybody have more details?

Another possibilty is to do it without virtuals.

Comment 7 Thilo Bangert (RETIRED) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-08-23 19:55:49 UTC

i forwarded the appropriate mail to gentoo-dev. please reopen if this turns out to be incorrect.