As per summary, check attached build log.
And _please_ try not to fix it in the wrong way: http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2009/07/02/how-_not_-to-fix-gcc-4-4-bugs
Created attachment 197355 [details]
Fixed in CVS, thanks.
Ehm are you sure?
Created attachment 199661 [details]
(In reply to comment #3)
> Ehm are you sure?
No, you are right. Managed to reproduce your case with all USE flags disabled.
Committed the missing bit to the gcc44.patch in tree (No ChangeLog entry, just cvs up to verify).