Bug 266502 – google-v8 svn ebuild

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Vladimir Dolzhenko 2009-04-17 10:55:38 UTC]

Google's open source JavaScript engine

Reproducible: Always




only x86 platform is supported

[Comment 1 Vladimir Dolzhenko 2009-04-17 10:56:23 UTC]

Created attachment 188666 [details]
google v8 javascipt engine svn ebuild

[Comment 2 Vladimir Dolzhenko 2009-08-04 16:32:26 UTC]

Created attachment 200167 [details]
google v8 javascipt engine svn ebuild

[Comment 3 Vladimir Dolzhenko 2009-08-04 16:33:03 UTC]

amd64 target platform was added

[Comment 4 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) 2009-08-04 16:37:51 UTC]

Vladimir, Please do not add arch teams to bugs. Thanks.

[Comment 5 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) 2009-08-04 16:39:16 UTC]

By the way, consider adding your ebuild to the sunrise overlay: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/sunrise/

[Comment 6 Mike Gilbert 2010-12-13 00:21:21 UTC]

I just spotted this old bug.

Do we want to add a live ebuild for v8?

It would be helpful for the chromium-9999 users who have USE="system-v8" (myself included). For now I am manually bumping v8 in an overlay anytime chromium upstream does a bump.

[Comment 7 Julien Sanchez 2010-12-13 07:15:10 UTC]

Yes, a live ebuild would be useful. I'm using chromium-9999 with system-v8 and I have to manually bump v8 too in a personal overlay.

(In reply to comment #6)
> I just spotted this old bug.
> 
> Do we want to add a live ebuild for v8?
> 
> It would be helpful for the chromium-9999 users who have USE="system-v8"
> (myself included). For now I am manually bumping v8 in an overlay anytime
> chromium upstream does a bump.
> 

[Comment 8 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. (RETIRED) 2010-12-13 08:10:52 UTC]

Could you submit an updated live ebuild based on the latest dev-lang/v8 ebuilds?

[Comment 9 Mike Gilbert 2010-12-13 17:11:48 UTC]

Created attachment 257039 [details]
Live ebuild based on v8-2.5.9.1.ebuild

[Comment 10 Mike Gilbert 2010-12-13 17:12:46 UTC]

Created attachment 257040 [details, diff]
Diff v8-2.5.9.1.ebuild versus v8-9999.ebuild

[Comment 11 Julien Sanchez 2010-12-14 13:09:24 UTC]

Live ebuild works for me except I have had to add ~amd64 keyword (don't know how to unmask package masked by missing keyword with no keyword.

[Comment 12 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. (RETIRED) 2010-12-14 16:10:05 UTC]

The ebuild is now in the tree (dev-lang/v8-9999). Thanks!

(In reply to comment #11)
> Live ebuild works for me except I have had to add ~amd64 keyword (don't know
> how to unmask package masked by missing keyword with no keyword.

See http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-amd64-faq.xml#keyword