Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 264530 - cnetworkmanager-0.8.4 (New Package)
Summary: cnetworkmanager-0.8.4 (New Package)
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 238422
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers
URL: http://vidner.net/martin/software/cne...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-04-01 18:49 UTC by B. Chociej
Modified: 2009-04-01 22:37 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
ebuild for 0.8.4 (cnetworkmanager-0.8.4.ebuild,767 bytes, text/plain)
2009-04-01 18:49 UTC, B. Chociej
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description B. Chociej 2009-04-01 18:49:19 UTC
Hello!

Attached is cnetworkmanager-0.8.4.ebuild. I see that older versions cnetworkmanager have been previously submitted (bug #238422), but they don't seem to have made their way into portage.

Anyways, cnetworkmanager is a command-line interface for NetworkManager (net-misc/networkmanager). It was created because NetworkManager has no user-friendly CLI included. It is written in Python and utilizes D-bus for communication.

IMHO, the logical place for it is net-misc/cnetworkmanager. It depends on dbus, dbus-python, pygobject, and (obviously) networkmanager.

This software is maintained by Martin Vidner at the URL listed in this bug and is licensed under GPL-2.

I use it to tell NetworkManager to connect to various wireless networks on a daily basis, and the current version has never given me problems.

Thanks,
Ben
Comment 1 B. Chociej 2009-04-01 18:49:48 UTC
Created attachment 187005 [details]
ebuild for 0.8.4
Comment 2 Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-04-01 22:37:36 UTC
First of all thank you for providing an updated ebuild for this package.

Please attach your ebuild to the already existing inclusion request bug. 
The reason this package still isn't in our portage-tree is that no maintainer volunteered for maintaining this package. Your duplicate bug-report unfortunately won't help changing this situation :-(

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 238422 ***