25888 – sympa mailing list manager and wwsympa, it web interface, are not in portage tree

Bug 25888 - sympa mailing list manager and wwsympa, it web interface, are not in portage tree

Summary: sympa mailing list manager and wwsympa, it web interface, are not in portage ...

Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 86734

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	High enhancement (vote)
Assignee:	Gentoo Web Application Packages Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Duplicates (1):	65894 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2003-08-04 11:05 UTC by psk
Modified:	2009-04-20 14:00 UTC (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description psk 2003-08-04 11:05:01 UTC

Is it possible to add the marvelous sympa mailing manager in portage tree ?
  Here is sympa web site : http://www.nerim.net/index.php3?file=ipv6.php
  Thx in advance.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Comment 1 Stuart Herbert (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2003-10-04 05:59:25 UTC

Hi!

My apologies, but I'm not a French-speaker, so I can't understand the website
for this package.

That said, we simply don't have the free time right now to create ebuilds
on request.

Have you tried writing an ebuild for this package?  On our website, we have
a good beginner's guide to writing ebuilds.  You can find our documentation
here: http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/docs.xml.

Come back with an ebuild, and we'll be happy to look at it again for you.

Best regards,
Stu

Comment 2 Andrej Kacian (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2004-10-03 11:23:01 UTC

*** Bug 65894 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Wolfram Schlich (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-04-20 13:59:56 UTC

Reopening...

Comment 4 Wolfram Schlich (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-04-20 14:00:07 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 86734 ***