Cryptkeeper is a Linux system tray applet that manages EncFS encrypted folders.
Created attachment 170669 [details] cryptkeeper-0.9.3.ebuild build and run on amd64
Fabio has updated the build to the current version: http://code.google.com/p/gentoo-ffb/source/browse/trunk/app-crypt/cryptkeeper?spec=svn12&r=12 Seems to be working out pretty good on Ubuntu: http://tuxtweaks.com/2009/03/create-an-encrypted-folder-in-ubuntu-with-cryptkeeper/
Just so you guys know, I've just committed an ebuild for cryptkeeper-0.9.5 to the Sunrise overlay. And since I don't have permission to edit this bug, could someone do the following? - Change the category in the summary to "app-crypt". - Add "EBUILD, InOverlay" to KEYWORDS. - Change the URL to http://tom.noflag.org.uk/cryptkeeper.html Thanks.
tnx to you Dean
Created attachment 332402 [details] cryptkeeper-0.9.5.ebuild We have the app-crypt/kencfs application in main portage tree, but it has less options and functionality compared to cryptkeeper. So it will be good cryptkeeper to become part of main portage tree (instead of being in overlays). I am willing to become a proxy maintainer for cryptkeeper, so here is an ebuild for the latest available cryptkeeper version - 0.9.5 It has all the Debian/Ubuntu patches applied (they are not distro specific). The WHIRLPOOL sum of the "cryptkeeper-0.9.5.tar.gz" source file is: 7cf04ef6626cfc49d773ba67b83ab54f5d47d16a88d1541a9d1d8d3d2add9c744403759904ed2fce1feda0f9a654eeec39e8fd0c169418823b60300917b63ab4 I am uploading the patches, ChangeLog and the metadata.xml files too. Please someone add REQUEST as keyword?
Created attachment 332404 [details, diff] cryptkeeper-0.9.5-binutils-gold.patch
Created attachment 332406 [details, diff] cryptkeeper-0.9.5-fix_cryptkeeper.desktop.patch
Created attachment 332408 [details, diff] cryptkeeper-0.9.5-fix-ftbfs-gcc-4.7-672010.patch
Created attachment 332410 [details, diff] cryptkeeper-0.9.5-is_mounted_overflow_fix.patch
Created attachment 332412 [details] The metadata.xml needed
Created attachment 332414 [details] The ChangeLog for the ebuild
REQUEST keyword done! Thanks PhobosK!
(In reply to comment #5) > I am willing to become a proxy maintainer for cryptkeeper I am CC'ing the entire team for that.
(In reply to comment #5) > Created attachment 332402 [details] > cryptkeeper-0.9.5.ebuild > > We have the app-crypt/kencfs application in main portage tree, but it has > less options and functionality compared to cryptkeeper. > So it will be good cryptkeeper to become part of main portage tree (instead > of being in overlays). > > I am willing to become a proxy maintainer for cryptkeeper, so here is an > ebuild for the latest available cryptkeeper version - 0.9.5 > It has all the Debian/Ubuntu patches applied (they are not distro specific). > The WHIRLPOOL sum of the "cryptkeeper-0.9.5.tar.gz" source file is: > 7cf04ef6626cfc49d773ba67b83ab54f5d47d16a88d1541a9d1d8d3d2add9c744403759904ed2 > fce1feda0f9a654eeec39e8fd0c169418823b60300917b63ab4 > > I am uploading the patches, ChangeLog and the metadata.xml files too. > > Please someone add REQUEST as keyword? tests fail. Could you have a look and submit a patch if needed? In the meantime I restricted them +*cryptkeeper-0.9.5 (17 Dec 2012) + + 17 Dec 2012; Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org> +cryptkeeper-0.9.5.ebuild, + +files/cryptkeeper-0.9.5-binutils-gold.patch, + +files/cryptkeeper-0.9.5-fix-ftbfs-gcc-4.7-672010.patch, + +files/cryptkeeper-0.9.5-fix_cryptkeeper.desktop.patch, + +files/cryptkeeper-0.9.5-is_mounted_overflow_fix.patch, +metadata.xml: + Initial commit. Thanks to PhobosK <phobosk@kbfx.net> who will proxy-maintain + it. Bug #245461