Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 245040 - udev rules conflict between uucp dialout device and user spcified
Summary: udev rules conflict between uucp dialout device and user spcified
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 245039
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-10-31 08:10 UTC by John (EBo) David
Modified: 2008-10-31 10:04 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description John (EBo) David 2008-10-31 08:10:29 UTC 
I have a series of tools to interface with embedded devices.  One of them uses an AT91SAM7 CPU.  When the device is running in normal mode it is recognized by the cdc_acm kernel device driver.  The udev rule matches the following line in /etc/udev/rules.d/65-permissions.rules:

    KERNEL=="ippp*|isdn*|dcbri*|capi*|rfcomm*|ttyACM[0-9]*", GROUP="uucp"

I need to modify the permissions to be MODE="666", adn would prefer to set this as a GROUP="plugdev".  Simply adding the MODE to the following line works, but I would rather NOT modify 65-permissions.rules but make a new rule 99-at91.rules.  I have been unable to override the 65-permissions.rules line above.  Any pointers or suggestions would be appreciated.

As a note, I posted this question a couple of times to #gentoo without response.  That is why I am posting here (which I do not feel is the most appropriate location).  Sorry for bothering you with this.

  EBo --
Comment 1 Serkan Kaba (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-10-31 09:36:13 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 245039 ***
Comment 2 John (EBo) David 2008-10-31 10:04:42 UTC 
ok... I have no idea how I posted this twice.  Both of them have been marked duplicates to each other...  So what is the solution?