pls add mesa 7.2 to app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-xlibs to offer 3d support for newer ati cards Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. emerge googleearth 2. googleeart 3. Actual Results: only slow software rendering Expected Results: fast hardware rendering
This is basically the same bug as 204755. The best solution imho seems to be to at a multilib-useflag to the regular mesa- and libdrm-ebuilds, but the Xorg-Team is unwilling to support this. But there are ebuilds attached to 204755 which build multilib mesa and libdrm.
Please, please, please update the mesa drivers and libraries in this package. On ATI Xpress 200M cards, a very common laptop video card, the r300_dri.so provided by this package crashes the *entire* system if you do anything even remotely 3D. For now I compiled my own version with multilib gcc and it works perfectly well, but I prefer having stuff out of portage... even if it is a craptastic mess of binary files rather than a nice multilib system as seen in bug #204755
If you want working googleearth, try multilib overlay. For more info connect to #gentoo-multilib-overlay on freenode irc
app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-xlibs-20091226 includes updated libdrm and X packages
(In reply to comment #4) > app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-xlibs-20091226 includes updated libdrm and X > packages > app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-xlibs-20091231 is broken if I downgrade to 20091231 acellerated 3D again works in wine. This is on mesa-9999 11:39:57 02/06/10 and a radeon 4200 IGP glxinfo | grep DRI OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R600 (RS880 9712) 20090101 TCL DRI2
I mean it is functional again if I downgrade to app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-xlibs-20081109 sorry for they typo
Open a separate bug report, anyway, emul packages are expected to work on "stable" setups (I mean, I am not sure how will it work with mesa-9999)
(In reply to comment #7) > Open a separate bug report, anyway, emul packages are expected to work on > "stable" setups (I mean, I am not sure how will it work with mesa-9999) > I mean, expected to work "better" on them, you can see what versions are included in http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/emul/content.xml If you are needing to use some testing packages for solving X problems, then, the problem could be on emul packages not including that fixed versions