Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 237265 - dev-python/nltk-data-0.9.5 (New Package)
Summary: dev-python/nltk-data-0.9.5 (New Package)
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Default Assignee for New Packages
URL: http://nltk.org/
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 237254
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2008-09-10 07:10 UTC by Tom Lippincott
Modified: 2011-10-05 15:48 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
ebuild for NLTK data files (nltk-data-0.9.5.ebuild,924 bytes, text/plain)
2008-09-10 07:11 UTC, Tom Lippincott
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Tom Lippincott 2008-09-10 07:10:34 UTC
This ebuild packages the data files (corpora etc.) of the NLTK python library.

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Tom Lippincott 2008-09-10 07:11:18 UTC
Created attachment 165076 [details]
ebuild for NLTK data files
Comment 2 Patrick Lauer gentoo-dev 2009-02-03 18:58:39 UTC
	if [ -e "${D}/usr/share/nltk_data/corpora/wordnet.zip" ]
	then
		unzip "${D}/usr/share/nltk_data/corpora/wordnet.zip" -d "${D}/usr/share/nltk_data/corpora/"


why do you do such weird things in the ebuild? Either it's there or not :)
Comment 3 Tom Lippincott 2009-02-04 02:26:57 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
>         if [ -e "${D}/usr/share/nltk_data/corpora/wordnet.zip" ]
>         then
>                 unzip "${D}/usr/share/nltk_data/corpora/wordnet.zip" -d
> "${D}/usr/share/nltk_data/corpora/"
> 
> 
> why do you do such weird things in the ebuild? Either it's there or not :)
> 

er, good point.  I think this ebuild was unnecessary anyways, I'm going to try getting a single NLTK ebuild polished and ready some time this week.
Comment 4 Matt Summers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-10-05 15:48:44 UTC
Closing as obsolete, lets take this over to bug 385749 for now. Re-open if you dissent to this, of course.