Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 223023 - app-text/ocropus-9999 (new ebuild)
Summary: app-text/ocropus-9999 (new ebuild)
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 185810
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Default Assignee for New Packages
URL: http://www.ocropus.org/
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-05-21 02:34 UTC by Stian Viskjer
Modified: 2008-07-20 18:18 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
ocropus-9999.ebuild (ocropus-9999.ebuild,1.58 KB, text/plain)
2008-05-21 02:35 UTC, Stian Viskjer 		Details
ocropus-9999-DESTDIR.patch (ocropus-9999-DESTDIR.patch,546 bytes, patch)
2008-05-21 02:36 UTC, Stian Viskjer 		Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Stian Viskjer 2008-05-21 02:34:39 UTC 
Tested with Rev 829 on x86.

Not sure if I've got this right since ocroscript doesn't seem to perform any better than tesseract.
I was under the impression that ocropus should improve the layout of the OCR... (from the Ocropus FAQ and Tesseract project site)

Depends on tesseract 2.x http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197167
and optionally on OpenFst http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=223011
and leptonlib (Leptonica) http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=223009

ocropus-0.1.1 released, but it doesn't compile due to some errors in the build system. (Tesseract linkage)

Maybe this should have gone into http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=185810 instead ?
Comment 1 Stian Viskjer 2008-05-21 02:35:50 UTC 
Created attachment 153823 [details]
ocropus-9999.ebuild
Comment 2 Stian Viskjer 2008-05-21 02:36:44 UTC 
Created attachment 153825 [details, diff]
ocropus-9999-DESTDIR.patch
Comment 3 Hanno Böck gentoo-dev 2008-07-20 18:18:23 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 185810 ***