Bug 217442 – Packages failing with dev-java/ibm-jdk-bin-1.6.0.1

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Petteri Räty (RETIRED) 2008-04-12 18:24:09 UTC]

You should emerge everything with *=ibm-jdk-bin-1.6 in jdk.conf and check that it's actually used for most packages while emerging. Lists of stable ebuilds can be generated with https://overlays.gentoo.org/svn/proj/java/scripts/find-stable-java-ebuilds will attach ones here too

[Comment 1 Petteri Räty (RETIRED) 2008-04-12 18:29:32 UTC]

Hmm. One thing to consider is that 0.1 should be coming and 0.0 is security vulnerable so might want to wait for 0.1.

[Comment 2 Petteri Räty (RETIRED) 2008-04-12 18:58:54 UTC]

Created attachment 149495 [details]
amd64.txt

[Comment 3 Petteri Räty (RETIRED) 2008-04-12 18:59:12 UTC]

Created attachment 149496 [details]
ppc.txt

[Comment 4 Petteri Räty (RETIRED) 2008-04-12 18:59:26 UTC]

Created attachment 149497 [details]
ppc64.txt

[Comment 5 Petteri Räty (RETIRED) 2008-04-12 18:59:40 UTC]

Created attachment 149499 [details]
x86.txt

[Comment 6 Petteri Räty (RETIRED) 2008-04-12 19:05:20 UTC]

Added testings instructions to our wiki https://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/java/wiki/JDKStabling

[Comment 7 nixnut (RETIRED) 2008-04-19 13:26:37 UTC]

(In reply to comment #1)
> Hmm. One thing to consider is that 0.1 should be coming and 0.0 is security
> vulnerable so might want to wait for 0.1.

Any idea when 0.1 can be expected? I've let 0.0 work through your ppc.txt list and found no new problems. So it looks good to go for ppc.

[Comment 8 Vlastimil Babka (Caster) (RETIRED) 2008-05-01 23:11:45 UTC]

So now we have 1.6.0.1, security fixed.
distfiles as usual (via ssh d.g.o:~caster/tmp)
The question is if we stable now or wait since there was a version bump. Although minor, on amd64 there seem to be larger changes in layout.

[Comment 9 Markus Rothe (RETIRED) 2008-05-11 15:05:43 UTC]

ppc64 stable

[Comment 10 nixnut (RETIRED) 2008-05-12 10:53:46 UTC]

ppc stable

[Comment 11 Serkan Kaba (RETIRED) 2008-06-14 12:40:06 UTC]

Revbumped to fix bugs #220461, #220463, #220467, #220479, #220495, #223575.

[Comment 12 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) 2008-06-16 06:41:40 UTC]

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 216112 ***

[Comment 13 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) 2008-06-16 07:17:24 UTC]

Sorry for the mess.

[Comment 14 Pacho Ramos 2009-12-20 10:59:03 UTC]

  09 Nov 2009; Markus Meier <[e-mail]> ibm-jdk-bin-1.6.0.6.ebuild:
  amd64 stable, bug #287490

[Comment 15 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) 2009-12-29 15:54:39 UTC]

We go out of here, as a security vulnerability is handled in bug 287490

[Comment 16 James Le Cuirot 2016-04-14 20:37:15 UTC]

ibm-jdk-bin has been last-rited and all dependent bugs are closed.