Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 21046 - nautilus-cd-burner 0.4.1 is out
Summary: nautilus-cd-burner 0.4.1 is out
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team
Depends on:
Reported: 2003-05-15 06:02 UTC by Andreas Proschofsky (RETIRED)
Modified: 2003-08-12 08:44 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Andreas Proschofsky (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-05-15 06:02:20 UTC
No ebuild attached - renaming the old one works

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Comment 1 Luca Barbato gentoo-dev 2003-05-15 09:28:07 UTC
Comment 2 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-05-15 09:54:21 UTC
it is that this package is p.mask-ed , but just bumping is not correct. the deps are wrong and should be fixed and it should use the SRC_URI . lu_zero, you should _check_ these things or otherwise please leave it to the gnome team.

besides that, to my knowledge nautilus-cd-burner will not work correctly for a general user unless you fix some access rights for several lowerlevel apps it uses. Since you added this ebuild lu_zero, could you also fix these issues or assure me they are non existant.
Comment 3 Luca Barbato gentoo-dev 2003-05-15 11:54:12 UTC
Ok, made some changes as requested.

still, it IS p.masked because it has serious usability issues and when the new nautilus will appear that packaged will be completely removed.

It is present just because somebody (not me) seems to like have that as ebuild.

The configure doesn't look for cdrtools and that's why I didn't include it as RDEPEND, excuse me for the mistake.

Still cdrtools have to be suid to the cdrw group but that is a cdrtools issue not a nautilus-cd-burner issue.

Assigning to team, up to them chose to remove completely or fix it.
Comment 4 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-05-16 13:01:19 UTC
hmm you added it in the first place, but you know i wasn't all happy with that either. There is no need to honour a user request if you have good reasons against it.

Besides that, the deps are still incorrect and with the src_uri fix i meant that you should let the eclass take care of it. But no need to fix that now, we'll have a look at it later on, this package needs serious work probably to get right.
Comment 5 Tim Yamin (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-08-12 08:44:36 UTC
This is already in portage. Closing
Comment 6 Tim Yamin (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-08-12 08:44:50 UTC
Closing bugs...