Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 209255 - app-text/libspectre-0.2.0 won't compile with ghostscript-esp or ghostscript-gnu
Summary: app-text/libspectre-0.2.0 won't compile with ghostscript-esp or ghostscript-gnu
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 209251
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: AMD64 Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-02-07 14:39 UTC by mwolejko
Modified: 2008-02-07 15:34 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description mwolejko 2008-02-07 14:39:58 UTC
libspectre-0.2.0 has a dependency on virtual/ghostscript. 

The ghostscript virtual package is further satisfied by ghostscript-esp, ghostscript-gnu, or ghostscript-gpl

However, with the current most up-to-date versions of ghostscript-esp (~8.15.4) or ghostscript-gnu (~8.60.0-r1) you get the following error when trying to compile libspectre:

checking for libgs >= 8.61... no
configure: error: You need libgs >= 8.61 in order to compile libspectre

Removing the offending flavors of ghostscript and emerging ghostscript-gpl (8.61-r1) resolves the problem. 

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Have either ghostscript-esp or ghostscript-gnu installed.
2. Try to emerge libspectre-0.2.0
3. Fail.

Actual Results:  
Error in the configuration process, failed compile.


It seems the current versions of ghostscript-esp and ghostscript-gnu, while good enough to satisfy the virtual/ghostscript requirement, are not high enough to satisfy the requirements of libspectre-0.2.0. 

ghostscript-gpl works fine though, and is actually stable. Maybe the dependency should be changed from the virtual ghostscript package to the specific ghostscript-gpl package?
Comment 1 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-02-07 15:34:06 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 209251 ***