From www.mutt.org: "Mutt 1.5.17 was released on November 1, 2007. This is a collection of bugfixes since the last release, as we stabilize the code for a 1.6 release." Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce:
Created attachment 142474 [details, diff] diff of mutt-1.5.16.ebuild and mutt-1.5.17.ebuild The only necessary changes are: updating the sidebar patch, updating mutt-1.5.17-gentoo-patches-r1.tar.bz2 with new versions of "02-compressed.patch" and "06-nntp.patch" (both are attached) and simply renaming the parallel-make patch for 1.5.17 version.
Created attachment 142476 [details, diff] new version of compressed patch, taken from http://www.spinnaker.de/mutt/compressed/
Created attachment 142478 [details, diff] new version of nntp patch, taken from http://mutt.org.ua/download/mutt-1.5.17/
ferdy: Why is sidebar applied exclusively from the rest of the Mutt patches? They apply almost perfectly - just the NNTP patch needs a tiny bit of manual rediff. If you can point me to your git repo of the mutt patchset, i'll spin you a set that will apply on top of the sidebar.
1.5.17 FTW! \0/
Mutt 1.5.18 was released on May 17, 2008.
(In reply to comment #4) > ferdy: Why is sidebar applied exclusively from the rest of the Mutt patches? > They apply almost perfectly - just the NNTP patch needs a tiny bit of manual > rediff. If you can point me to your git repo of the mutt patchset, i'll spin > you a set that will apply on top of the sidebar. > Upstream only wants it to be applied on top of vanilla. I don't recall which, but I released a patchset that applied the sidebar patch on top of the rest. Turns out, the sidebar patch causes a lot of troubles (even when disabled) for people with big mailboxes. Tried getting it sorted upstream without luck. I'm not going to spend a second on that patch because it is crappy and messy. I only use a git repo for convenience, but what I usually do is just import new versions of the patches into a stgit stack on a fresh repo for each release. So my repo doesn't have any magic that would help anybody :) I don't have the time to maintain a proper patchset for mutt. I think I'll drop the patchset all together in the next couple of versions and let others maintain it if they want to. - ferdy
http://www.mutt.org.ua/download/mutt-1.5.18/patch-1.5.18.rr.compressed.gz works fine in place of 02-compressed.patch http://www.mutt.org.ua/download/mutt-1.5.18/patch-1.5.18.vvv.nntp.gz in place of 06-nntp.patch http://www.lunar-linux.org/~tchan/mutt/patch-1.5.18.sidebar.20080611.txt applies fine http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/alt/browser/trunk/prefix-overlay/mail-client/mutt/files/mutt-1.5.18-mbox_hook.patch works fine in place of 04-mbox_hook.patch the rest still applies, except for the parallel-make.patch, which I didn't care enough about.
I should have added that the nntp patch from the url I posted kills compilation of mixmaster (it removes the definition of HDR_MIX for some reason) so I took that as an incompatibility of the two and added $(use_with !nntp mixmaster) in the ebuild instead.
Created attachment 161467 [details, diff] Fix GPGME S/MIME micalg generation This patch applies to mutt-1.5.18 and fixes wrong micalg bug which prevents thunderbird (and possibly other clients) from checking a S/MIME signature. See http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/2994
I would like to try to install mutt 1.5.18 from my local overlay. As far as I understood, the ebuild does not need any modifications and the trick is creating the mutt-1.5.18-gentoo-patches-r1.tar.bz2. Is it reasonable, to test the package, to to download the patches into /usr/local/portage/mail-client/mutt/files and substitute the section src_unpack() by: src_unpack() { unpack ${A} && cd "${S}" || die "unpack failed" for p in "${FILESDIR}"/*.patch ; do epatch "${p}" done AT_M4DIR="m4" eautoreconf } Also, I have had a look at mutt-1.5.18 ebuild from dberkholz's overlay, and the line applying the parallel-make.patch is commented. Is this patch necessary? # epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${P}-parallel-make.patch
After removing the prefix specific bits, the mutt-1.5.18.ebuild from http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/alt works perfectly (thanks much for the work!). Any chance we can move this into the main tree? Thanks, Markus
(In reply to comment #12) > After removing the prefix specific bits, the mutt-1.5.18.ebuild from > http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/alt works perfectly (thanks much for > the work!). Any chance we can move this into the main tree? > > Thanks, > Markus > This is working good for me as well.
Commit please Fix: 211968,211673,209760,194762
Created attachment 170946 [details] Prefix-less ebuild for mutt-1.5.18 taken from the alt overlay Hi Guys, The current ebuild in the alt overlay used prefix, which isn't supported by the stable version of portage on my system. I attach a prefix-less version of that ebuild. I also added the fantastic X-Label patch by David Champion, so if you don't like it comment the appropriate line out. GI
Created attachment 170947 [details] Files for the mutt-1.5.18 ebuild
I installed your ebuild Gautam and it seems to work well. Thank you.
I just bumped to 1.5.19. Still masked for as long as we don't have a working sidebar patch. Patchset has grown a bit.
