Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 196309 - app-backup/rdup-0.5.2 - encrypted/zipped/remote backups
Summary: app-backup/rdup-0.5.2 - encrypted/zipped/remote backups
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: AMD64 Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Default Assignee for New Packages
URL: http://www.miek.nl/projects/rdup/inde...
Whiteboard: sunrise-removal
Keywords: EBUILD, InOverlay
: 493162 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-10-18 17:35 UTC by Noah Pritikin
Modified: 2017-02-06 08:27 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
Initial ebuild (rdup-0.5.2.ebuild,1.10 KB, text/plain)
2007-10-18 17:36 UTC, Noah Pritikin
Details
I removed tar and findutils from the dependency list. The app developer pointed these out for me. (rdup-0.5.2.ebuild,1.07 KB, text/plain)
2007-10-18 18:20 UTC, Noah Pritikin
Details
I removed tar and findutils from the dependency list. The app developer pointed these out for me. (rdup-0.5.2.ebuild,1.07 KB, text/plain)
2007-10-18 18:21 UTC, Noah Pritikin
Details
rdup-0.5.4.ebuild (rdup-0.5.4.ebuild,868 bytes, text/plain)
2008-01-23 12:44 UTC, Fabio Rossi
Details
rdup-0.3.6-bin-install.diff (rdup-0.3.6-bin-install.diff,525 bytes, patch)
2008-01-23 12:45 UTC, Fabio Rossi
Details | Diff
rdup-0.5.4.ebuild (rdup-0.5.4.ebuild,867 bytes, text/plain)
2008-01-25 11:33 UTC, Fabio Rossi
Details
rdup-0.3.6-bin-install.diff (rdup-0.3.6-bin-install.diff,517 bytes, patch)
2008-01-25 11:34 UTC, Fabio Rossi
Details | Diff
rdup-0.5.5.ebuild (rdup-0.5.5.ebuild,868 bytes, text/plain)
2008-03-14 20:59 UTC, Tom Hendrikx
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Noah Pritikin 2007-10-18 17:35:38 UTC
The developer that wrote hdup2 has moved on to another (better) project called rdup. This application is best described by nicehacks.org: "rdup is a platform for backups. It provides a list of files to backup and the necessary mechanisms to process them. It delegates the encryption, compression, transfer and packaging to other utilities in a true Unix-way."

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:




See attachment for initial ebuild that I've tested on the amd64 platform.
Comment 1 Noah Pritikin 2007-10-18 17:36:42 UTC
Created attachment 133795 [details]
Initial ebuild
Comment 2 Noah Pritikin 2007-10-18 18:20:26 UTC
Created attachment 133800 [details]
I removed tar and findutils from the dependency list.  The app developer pointed these out for me.
Comment 3 Noah Pritikin 2007-10-18 18:21:29 UTC
Created attachment 133801 [details]
I removed tar and findutils from the dependency list.  The app developer pointed these out for me.
Comment 4 Fabio Rossi 2008-01-23 12:44:03 UTC
Created attachment 141648 [details]
rdup-0.5.4.ebuild

Simplified ebuild: removed dependencies already in system, docs not needed, the elog notice because doesn't provide extra information
Comment 5 Fabio Rossi 2008-01-23 12:45:14 UTC
Created attachment 141650 [details, diff]
rdup-0.3.6-bin-install.diff

patch for the cron example
Comment 6 Fabio Rossi 2008-01-25 11:33:09 UTC
Created attachment 141757 [details]
rdup-0.5.4.ebuild

fixed dep typo error
Comment 7 Fabio Rossi 2008-01-25 11:34:07 UTC
Created attachment 141759 [details, diff]
rdup-0.3.6-bin-install.diff

updated patch with the correct name of the executable
Comment 8 Tom Hendrikx 2008-03-14 20:59:13 UTC
Created attachment 146159 [details]
rdup-0.5.5.ebuild

New version, updated the license to GPLv3
Comment 9 Tom Hendrikx 2009-01-14 20:36:09 UTC
I've added an ebuild for the current version of rdup to the Sunrise overlay. I'll try to keep the ebuild up-to-date with upstream releases. 

When you have problems with or suggestions for the ebuild, please feel free to use this bug or send me an e-mail.
Comment 10 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2009-04-14 03:11:47 UTC
(this is an automated message based on filtering criteria that matched this bug)
'EBUILD' is in the KEYWORDS which should mean that there is a ebuild attached 
to this bug.
This bug is assigned to maintainer-wanted which means that it is not in the 
main tree.
Heuristics show that no Gentoo developer has commented on your ebuild.

Hello, The Gentoo Team would like to firstly thank you for your ebuild 
submission. We also apologize for not being able to accommodate you in a timely
manner. There are simply too many new packages.

Allow me to use this opportunity to introduce you to Gentoo Sunrise. The 
sunrise overlay[1] is a overlay for Gentoo which we allow trusted users to 
commit to and all users can have ebuilds reviewed by Gentoo devs for entry 
into the overlay. So, the sunrise team is suggesting that you look into this 
and submit your ebuild to the overlay where even *you* can commit to. =)

Because this is a mass message, we are also asking you to be patient with us. 
We anticipate a large number of requests in a short time. 

Thanks,
On behalf of the Gentoo Sunrise Team,
Jeremy.

[1]: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/sunrise/
[2]: http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/sunrise/wiki/SunriseFaq
Comment 11 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-12-03 11:12:08 UTC
*** Bug 493162 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Michał Górny archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2016-06-08 16:46:56 UTC
Hello, everyone.

It seems that at least one ebuild related to this bug exists in the Sunrise overlay at the moment. However, I have to regretfully announce that after a long inactivity period the Sunrise project has been discontinued and the related overlay will be eventually removed. For this reason, I'd like to ask you to reevaluate the ebuilds and consider moving them. If you'd like to maintain a package from Sunrise in Gentoo, please take a look at our Proxy Maintainers [1] project.

Please make sure to take ebuilds from the unreviewed developer Sunrise repository [2] rather than the -reviewed one, since the latter has not been updated for over a year. While at it, please note that:

1. Adding a package to Gentoo requires declaring yourself as an active maintainer for it. All bugs regarding the package will be assigned to you, and you will be expected to maintain it.

2. Some packages may not be suitable for addition anymore. While there's no strong rules that would prevent you from adding a package, it may be a bad idea to add old-unmaintained packages that will shortly result in a large number of bugs reported with no solution. If that is the case, please close the bug as RESOLVED/OBSOLETE to make it easier to find packages worth adding.

3. Some of the bugs were already closed as WONTFIX/OBSOLETE/... while the relevant ebuild was kept in Sunrise. If you disagree with the original decision, you still can add the ebuild via proxy-maint.

4. Pleaes note that many of the Sunrise ebuilds are old and may be buggy. If you decide to move them, please make sure to update/clean them up. The proxy-maint team will also review your ebuilds, therefore making sure they land in Gentoo in good quality.

Once again, thank you for your contribution. We hope that you will still want to contribute to Gentoo, through proxy-maint or otherwise.


[1]:https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers
[2]:https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/sunrise.git/
Comment 13 Robin Johnson archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2017-02-06 00:04:03 UTC
[master 7ed538f4aa] app-backup/rdup: new package.
 Author: Tom Hendrikx (whyscream) <tom@whyscream.net>
 Date: Sun Feb 5 15:54:59 2017 -0800
 3 files changed, 54 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 app-backup/rdup/Manifest
 create mode 100644 app-backup/rdup/metadata.xml
 create mode 100644 app-backup/rdup/rdup-1.1.15.ebuild

This is now committed in the main tree, as infra is evaluating it for backups.

tom@whyscream.net:
Thanks Tom, your ebuild was usable with a single tweak for the new upstream version. Are you interested in being a proxy maintainer for it (should be very little work, since upstream is "stable" without feature changes).
Comment 14 Tom Hendrikx 2017-02-06 08:27:54 UTC
(In reply to Robin Johnson from comment #13)

> tom@whyscream.net:
> Thanks Tom, your ebuild was usable with a single tweak for the new upstream
> version. Are you interested in being a proxy maintainer for it (should be
> very little work, since upstream is "stable" without feature changes).

Hi Robin,

Since some time I no longer use rdup for my own backups, and also stopped using Gentoo as a production OS altogether. So I think I'm not the correct person to (proxy) maintain any Gentoo package anymore.