193624 – dev-lisp/cl-drakma-0.4.0: Download or Digest verification failed for drakma_0.4.0.orig.tar.gz

Bug 193624 - dev-lisp/cl-drakma-0.4.0: Download or Digest verification failed for drakma_0.4.0.orig.tar.gz

Summary: dev-lisp/cl-drakma-0.4.0: Download or Digest verification failed for drakma_0...

Status:	RESOLVED FIXED

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	Normal enhancement (vote)
Assignee:	Common Lisp Bugs

URL:	http://dev.gentoo.org/~zmedico/infra/...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Duplicates (2):	193622 224691 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-09-24 12:20 UTC by Distfiles Failure Bot
Modified:	2008-09-02 13:49 UTC (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Distfiles Failure Bot 2007-09-24 12:20:21 UTC

The distfiles script failed to download the following file:
* drakma_0.4.0.orig.tar.gz, 'fetcher return no uris succeeded'

There could be several reasons for this, including changed upstream
DIST-files or wrong SRC_URIs.

The Distfiles Mirroring Changes Report (see URL field) has a current list
of failed files and explanations.

(Auto-filed bug by gen-bug.py, contact rbu@gentoo.org for complaints)

Comment 1 Robert Buchholz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2007-09-24 12:24:31 UTC

*** Bug 193622 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester

2008-06-03 02:32:29 UTC

*** Bug 224691 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester

2008-06-03 02:34:08 UTC

No way that I can find to get the distfile...~9 months of no response. 

Masking unless I hear any objections. thanks.

Comment 4 Marijn Schouten (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-06-03 09:04:15 UTC

Please don't mask, it just creates problems for those who have the tarball and want to re-emerge.

Comment 5 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester

2008-06-03 12:40:13 UTC

(In reply to comment #4)
> Please don't mask, it just creates problems for those who have the tarball and
> want to re-emerge.

Ok. I'm volunteering to help update the ebuild if you have a working distfile somewhere. Let me know because I couldn't find anything.

(Removing treecleaner@g.o because the maintainers want this fixed instead of removed)

Comment 6 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester

2008-06-04 22:32:05 UTC

Private conversation with hkBest on irc and he approved masking this version only to help clean up the tree.

Giving this one a 60 day window.

Comment 7 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester

2008-09-02 13:49:35 UTC

removed specific version from tree.