Maybe there'll be blocking dependency? Or exists another solution? Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. echo >x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-1.0.9699 2. emerge =x11-base/xorg-server-1.4 3. emerge x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers 4. startx Actual Results: X Server crashes =) Expected Results: Successful start tolich@tolich ~ $ emerge --info Portage 2.1.3.9 (default-linux/x86/2007.0/desktop, gcc-4.2.0, glibc-2.6.1-r0, 2.6.22-gentoo-r6 i686) ================================================================= System uname: 2.6.22-gentoo-r6 i686 Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.40GHz Timestamp of tree: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 19:00:01 +0000 ccache version 2.4 [enabled] app-shells/bash: 3.2_p17-r1 dev-java/java-config: 1.3.7, 2.0.33-r1 dev-lang/python: 2.5.1-r2 dev-util/ccache: 2.4-r7 sys-apps/baselayout: 2.0.0_rc4-r1 sys-apps/sandbox: 1.2.18.1 sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13, 2.61-r1 sys-devel/automake: 1.5, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r2, 1.10 sys-devel/binutils: 2.18.50.0.1 sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.4.0-r2 sys-devel/libtool: 1.5.24 virtual/os-headers: 2.6.22-r2 ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86" CBUILD="i686-pc-linux-gnu" CFLAGS="-O2 -march=pentium4 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer" CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu" CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/3.5/env /usr/kde/3.5/share/config /usr/kde/3.5/shutdown /usr/share/X11/xkb /usr/share/config" CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/env.d /etc/env.d/java/ /etc/fonts/fonts.conf /etc/gconf /etc/gentoo-release /etc/php/apache2-php5/ext-active/ /etc/php/cgi-php5/ext-active/ /etc/php/cli-php5/ext-active/ /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/terminfo /etc/udev/rules.d" CXXFLAGS="-O2 -march=pentium4 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer" DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles" FEATURES="ccache distlocks metadata-transfer parallel-fetch sandbox sfperms strict unmerge-orphans" GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://mirror.yandex.ru/gentoo-distfiles/" LANG="ru_RU.utf8" LINGUAS="ru en" MAKEOPTS="-j2" PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages" PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS="--recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times --compress --force --whole-file --delete --delete-after --stats --timeout=180 --exclude=/distfiles --exclude=/local --exclude=/packages --filter=H_**/files/digest-*" PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp" PORTDIR="/usr/portage" PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/portage/local/layman/xeffects /usr/local/portage" SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage" USE="X aac acl acpi aim alsa apache2 berkdb bitmap-fonts bzip2 cairo cdr cgi cli cracklib crypt dbus dri dvd dvdread eds emboss encode esd evo exif fam ffmpeg firefox fortran ftp gdbm gif gpm gstreamer gtk gtk2 hal iconv icq isdnlog jabber java javascript jpeg jpeg2k kde kdehiddenvisibility kerberos mad midi mikmod mime mmx mp3 mpeg mplayer mudflap mysql ncurses nls nptl nptlonly nsplugin ogg opengl openmp pam pcre pdf perl php png pppd python qt3support qt4 quicktime readline real reflection samba sdl session spell spl sse sse2 ssl svg tcpd threads tiff timidity truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts unicode usb vorbis win32codecs x86 xcomposite xine xml xorg xpm xv xvid zip zlib" ALSA_CARDS="intel8x0 seq-dummy" ALSA_PCM_PLUGINS="adpcm alaw asym copy dmix dshare dsnoop empty extplug file hooks iec958 ioplug ladspa lfloat linear meter mulaw multi null plug rate route share shm softvol" ELIBC="glibc" INPUT_DEVICES="evdev keyboard mouse" KERNEL="linux" LINGUAS="ru en" USERLAND="GNU" VIDEO_CARDS="nvidia nv" Unset: CTARGET, EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS, INSTALL_MASK, LC_ALL, LDFLAGS, PORTAGE_COMPRESS, PORTAGE_COMPRESS_FLAGS, PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS
Created attachment 130435 [details] Xorg.0.log
Yeah, you can wait until nVidia releases fixed drivers.
*** Bug 191913 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Does it works with 100.14.11 ?
(In reply to comment #4) > Does it works with 100.14.11 ? > I think that yes, but this version does not support my video card, and i'm receiving another error.
*** Bug 192117 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
(In reply to comment #4) > Does it works with 100.14.11 ? No
im voting here in the hope somebody from upstream will get off their ass and decide to do the customer service part of their job. this crap is beyond a joke.
*** Bug 192153 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
(In reply to comment #8) > im voting here in the hope somebody from upstream will get off their ass and > decide to do the customer service part of their job. this crap is beyond a > joke. > If you can't wait for upstream here's the quick'n'dirty workaround emerge --nodeps nvidia-drivers startx -- -ignoreABI I know this really should be fixed with a new driver-version...
(In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #8) > > im voting here in the hope somebody from upstream will get off their ass and > > decide to do the customer service part of their job. this crap is beyond a > > joke. > > > > If you can't wait for upstream here's the quick'n'dirty workaround > > emerge --nodeps nvidia-drivers > startx -- -ignoreABI > > I know this really should be fixed with a new driver-version... > In that case i've not direct rendering... Bad. (EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to initialize the GLX module; please check in your X (EE) NVIDIA(0): log file that the GLX module has been loaded in your X (EE) NVIDIA(0): server, and that the module is the NVIDIA GLX module. If (EE) NVIDIA(0): you continue to encounter problems, Please try (EE) NVIDIA(0): reinstalling the NVIDIA driver.
Folks, could you take the debate to forums.gentoo.org please? This is not a discussion forum.
Nvidia 100.14.19 released today is compatible with xorg-server-1.4. Should have blocked <=x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-100.14.11, xorg-server-r1 blocks the compatible driver.
(In reply to comment #13) > Nvidia 100.14.19 released today is compatible with xorg-server-1.4. > > Should have blocked <=x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-100.14.11, xorg-server-r1 > blocks the compatible driver. > How does this help this bug? Is Nvidia now supporting 96xx generation drivers with 100.14.11 or not?, if not, we still have to wait for a 96xx family compatible version ( if nvidia can be bothered releasing one ). I pitty those in the 7xxx tree :/.
http://us.download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86/100.14.19/README/appendix-a.html A little observation I made. The Important Stuff is at the bottom. Note a reference to 96.43.xx now instead of 1.0-96xx, and noting that there is currently no 9643 i can get my hands on, Im presuming its not far from arriving, so maybe not all is lost :) --- 100.14.11 +++ 100.14.19 @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ <td>0x0091</td> </tr> <tr> -<td>GeForce 7800 GTX</td> +<td>GeForce 7800 GT</td> <td>0x0092</td> </tr> <tr> @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ <td>0x00F5</td> </tr> <tr> -<td>GeForce 6800 GS/XT</td> +<td>GeForce 6800 GS</td> <td>0x00F6</td> </tr> <tr> @@ -283,6 +283,10 @@ <td>0x0194</td> </tr> <tr> +<td>Tesla C870</td> +<td>0x0197</td> +</tr> +<tr> <td>GeForce 7350 LE</td> <td>0x01D0</td> </tr> @@ -395,14 +399,26 @@ <td>0x0299</td> </tr> <tr> -<td>GeForce 7600 GT/Unknown GPU</td> +<td>GeForce 7600 GT/GeForce 7600 GT</td> <td>0x02E0</td> </tr> <tr> -<td>GeForce 7600 GS</td> +<td>GeForce 7600 GS/GeForce 7600 GS</td> <td>0x02E1</td> </tr> <tr> +<td>GeForce 7300 GT</td> +<td>0x02E2</td> +</tr> +<tr> +<td>GeForce 7900 GS</td> +<td>0x02E3</td> +</tr> +<tr> +<td>GeForce 7950 GT</td> +<td>0x02E4</td> +</tr> +<tr> <td>GeForce FX 5800 Ultra</td> <td>0x0301</td> </tr> @@ -571,10 +587,18 @@ <td>0x0402</td> </tr> <tr> +<td>GeForce 8400 GS</td> +<td>0x0404</td> +</tr> +<tr> <td>GeForce 8600M GT</td> <td>0x0407</td> </tr> <tr> +<td>GeForce 8700M GT</td> +<td>0x0409</td> +</tr> +<tr> <td>GeForce 8500 GT</td> <td>0x0421</td> </tr> @@ -671,7 +695,7 @@ <td>0x014A</td> </tr> <tr> -<td>Quadro FX 540M/Quadro FX 540M</td> +<td>Quadro FX 540M</td> <td>0x014C</td> </tr> <tr> @@ -783,6 +807,10 @@ <td>0x039E</td> </tr> <tr> +<td>Quadro FX 370</td> +<td>0x040A</td> +</tr> +<tr> <td>Quadro NVS 320M</td> <td>0x040B</td> </tr> @@ -795,6 +823,14 @@ <td>0x040D</td> </tr> <tr> +<td>Quadro FX 570</td> +<td>0x040E</td> +</tr> +<tr> +<td>Quadro FX 1700</td> +<td>0x040F</td> +</tr> +<tr> <td>Quadro NVS 140M</td> <td>0x0429</td> </tr> @@ -810,13 +846,17 @@ <td>Quadro FX 360M</td> <td>0x042D</td> </tr> +<tr> +<td>Quadro NVS 290</td> +<td>0x042F</td> +</tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <p>Below are the legacy GPUs that are no longer supported in the unified driver. These GPUs will continue to be maintained through the special legacy NVIDIA GPU driver releases.</p> -<p>The 1.0-96xx driver supports the following set of GPUs:</p> +<p>The 96.43.xx driver supports the following set of GPUs:</p> <div class="informaltable"> <table summary="(no summary available)" border="0"> <colgroup> @@ -1008,7 +1048,7 @@ </tbody> </table> </div> -<p>The 1.0-71xx driver supports the following set of GPUs:</p> +<p>The 71.86.xx driver supports the following set of GPUs:</p> <div class="informaltable"> <table summary="(no summary available)" border="0"> <colgroup>