Bug 181457 – sys-apps/acl-2.2.44: Ignored LDFLAGS: /lib/libacl.so.1.1.0

• Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 126825
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED) 2007-06-09 17:35:13 UTC]

/var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/acl-2.2.44/image/lib/libacl.so.1.1.0
  [ 1] .hash            HASH           000000f4 0000f4 000260 04   A  3   0  4

Ignoring LDLFAGS increases files sizes and decreases performance.

[Comment 1 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-06-12 17:48:16 UTC]

OK, that was about enough.

1/ Use common sense when filing bugs (like, what about mailing gentoo-dev mailing list first and asking about the best course of action here?
2/ If you have a patch, submit it *upstream* unless this is a *Gentoo-specific* issue.

[Comment 2 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED) 2007-06-12 18:02:09 UTC]

I have patch to this bug. Should I reopen it?

--- sys-apps/acl/acl-2.2.44.ebuild
+++ sys-apps/acl/acl-2.2.44.ebuild
@@ -39,8 +39,9 @@
 }

 src_compile() {
-       export OPTIMIZER=${CFLAGS}
-       export DEBUG=-DNDEBUG
+       export DEBUG="-DNDEBUG"
+       export OPTIMIZER="${CFLAGS}"
+       export LTLDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS}"

        econf \
                $(use_enable nls gettext) \

[Comment 3 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED) 2007-06-12 20:17:37 UTC]

(In reply to comment #1)
> 2/ If you have a patch, submit it *upstream* unless this is a
> *Gentoo-specific* issue.

Not exporting LTLDFLAGS in ebuild is Gentoo-specific, so I'm reopening this bug report. I somebody wants, I can attach the patch, which is already written in comment 2.

[Comment 4 SpanKY 2007-06-13 23:27:01 UTC]

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 126825 ***