Something pointed out on IRC, http://www.gentoo.org/doc/da/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1&chap=8 still mentions /etc/conf.d/domainname instead of /etc/conf.d/net for dealing with domain names.
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/da/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1&chap=8 : """ Opdateret 19. oktober 2005 The original version of this document was last updated March 25, 2007 """
Then I would suggest that this notice needs to be larger or highlighted in some way and in danish because it's obvious that people are still following this outdated document without realising that it's outdated. I'd perhaps even go so far as to suggest it should be removed altogether or placed in a clearly unofficial / archive area.
(In reply to comment #2) > I'd perhaps even go so > far as to suggest it should be removed altogether or placed in a clearly > unofficial / archive area. +1; this is so outdated that it documents totally unsupported stuff like stage 1/2 installs etc. We shouldn't provide such horribly outdated outdated docs as official, it's very confusing. http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gdp/doc/translators-howto.xml#doc_chap3
We never remove old translations. It is clearly stated that they are outdated. Besides, they are not linked to from our indexes. Feel free to send us updates.
(In reply to comment #4) > It is clearly stated that they are outdated. Uhm, a tiny 'last updated' notice somewhere is not exactly 'clearly stated as outdated'. > Feel free to send us updates. Poke me next week, I'll take a quick Danish course. :P