Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 170876 - x11-libs/wxGTK--2.6.3.3 - gtk_container_remove assert fail when deleting page from wxNotebook
Summary: x11-libs/wxGTK--2.6.3.3 - gtk_container_remove assert fail when deleting page...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 151528
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Library (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo wxWidgets project
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-03-14 14:00 UTC by Frank Szczerba
Modified: 2007-04-05 10:05 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Backport fix from wxWidgets-2.8.0 (wxGTK-2.6.3.3-notebook.patch,716 bytes, patch)
2007-03-14 14:01 UTC, Frank Szczerba 		Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Frank Szczerba 2007-03-14 14:00:31 UTC 
Every page removed from a wxNotebook causes the following assertion:

Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_container_remove: assertion `GTK_IS_TOOLBAR (container) || widget->parent == GTK_WIDGET (container)' failed


Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
Comment 1 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-03-14 14:01:51 UTC 
What's wxNotebook? We don't support this stuff that's not in the tree at all.
Comment 2 Frank Szczerba 2007-03-14 14:01:51 UTC 
Created attachment 113256 [details, diff]
Backport fix from wxWidgets-2.8.0
Comment 3 Frank Szczerba 2007-03-14 14:03:05 UTC 
Did you read the summary? It's a component of wxGTK-2.6.3.3 that is in the tree.

The fix is attached.
Comment 4 Mart Raudsepp gentoo-dev 2007-04-05 09:59:26 UTC 
This fix is in the upcoming 2.6.4.0 bump, which I unfortunately can't get in before next week, as I'll be offline shortly until evening of Sunday, 8th April.
Comment 5 Mart Raudsepp gentoo-dev 2007-04-05 10:05:01 UTC 
Marking as duplicate against the bug that covers a crash case in amule, that's caused from the lack of this very same patch.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 151528 ***