Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 164853 - Rosegarden package interprets incorrect versions
Summary: Rosegarden package interprets incorrect versions
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 152860
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High minor (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-02-01 15:08 UTC by Paulo J. Matos
Modified: 2007-02-01 16:11 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Paulo J. Matos 2007-02-01 15:08:29 UTC 
In portage:
http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=rosegarden

There are four versions and two of them show up as 4.1.0, however, 4.1.0 is in reality 1.0, not 4.1.0. Problem is that rosegarden used to be called Rosegarden4 when 1.0 was shipped. Later they changed to Rosegarden only (dropping the 4) and shipped 1.2.4 and 1.4.0. Portage is interpreting rosegarden 4.1.0-r2 as the most recent version, however, it is not. So 4.1.0-r1 and 4.1.0-r2 should be renamed 1.0-r1 and 1.0-r2.

Yet, 1.4.0 should be marked stable, 1.0 (or 4.1.0 as it shows in portage) seems to have a bug with respect to the kernel clock (mentioned in rosegarden mailing list).


Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-02-01 16:11:03 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 152860 ***