Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 155533 - Update ati-drivers to 8.32.5
Summary: Update ati-drivers to 8.32.5
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: X11 External Driver Maintainers
URL: http://ati.amd.com
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 156479 158083 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-11-17 16:52 UTC by gent_bz
Modified: 2006-12-29 07:12 UTC (History)
16 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
Updated ebuild for x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.31.5 (ati-drivers-8.31.5.ebuild,11.00 KB, text/plain)
2006-11-27 04:06 UTC, Elias Probst
Details
ati-drivers-8.31.5.ebuild incl. Fedora config.h patch (ati-drivers-8.31.5.ebuild,11.28 KB, application/octet-stream)
2006-12-03 02:35 UTC, Pandor
Details
NMI message related to b1 cpu0 (dmesg_nmimsg-r1,16.75 KB, text/plain)
2006-12-04 02:14 UTC, Olivier Mondoloni
Details
My emerge --info (emergeinfo,2.70 KB, text/plain)
2006-12-04 02:14 UTC, Olivier Mondoloni
Details
my Xorg log (Xorg.0.log,42.16 KB, text/plain)
2006-12-04 02:15 UTC, Olivier Mondoloni
Details
my xorg.conf (xorg.conf,2.60 KB, text/plain)
2006-12-04 02:17 UTC, Olivier Mondoloni
Details
Fix compile on linux kernel version >= 2.6.20 (ati-drivers-8.32.5-2.6.20.patch,5.05 KB, patch)
2006-12-20 10:49 UTC, Thomas Meyer
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description gent_bz 2006-11-17 16:52:08 UTC
Bumpity.
Comment 1 subs 2006-11-26 19:37:13 UTC
double bump
Comment 2 Elias Probst 2006-11-27 04:06:45 UTC
Created attachment 102835 [details]
Updated ebuild for x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.31.5

Here's an updated ebuild.

Changes:
 - changed SRC_URI to reflect the changed name of the runinstaller
 - Added einfo about a bug causing a lot of trouble since 8.25.x (http://ati.cchtml.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509)

I'm running the new driver here on a Mobility x1600 and works fine.
Comment 3 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-11-28 01:33:17 UTC
*** Bug 156479 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Gianluca Parmiggiani 2006-12-01 04:27:49 UTC
it doesn't compile with kernel 2.6.19 but i'm going to file another bug (missing linux/config.h) if anyone hasn't done it yet.
Comment 5 Gianluca Parmiggiani 2006-12-01 04:33:28 UTC
applying the patch from http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151596 make it compiles fine
Comment 6 James Ward 2006-12-02 08:55:47 UTC
I think that these patches are a better solution:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156876

I've tested this on 8.31.5 and kernel 2.6.19 and it works.
Comment 7 Pandor 2006-12-03 02:22:13 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> I think that these patches are a better solution:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156876
> 
> I've tested this on 8.31.5 and kernel 2.6.19 and it works.
> 
Second that.
Better to check for kernel version and apply Fedora patches, then to remove config.h includes altogether.
Comment 8 Pandor 2006-12-03 02:35:38 UTC
Created attachment 103254 [details]
ati-drivers-8.31.5.ebuild incl. Fedora config.h patch

Updated ebuild with Fedora patch for 2.6 kernel.
Comment 9 Olivier Mondoloni 2006-12-04 02:14:13 UTC
Created attachment 103308 [details]
NMI message related to b1 cpu0

I try the lastest ebuild from here but when I used this ati-drivers it displays in my dmesg a message related to nmi b1 cpu0. I tested my ram modules but all of it are good. I try to downgrade to 8.30.3 ati-drivers and no nmi message appeared.
Comment 10 Olivier Mondoloni 2006-12-04 02:14:50 UTC
Created attachment 103309 [details]
My emerge --info
Comment 11 Olivier Mondoloni 2006-12-04 02:15:28 UTC
Created attachment 103310 [details]
my Xorg log
Comment 12 Olivier Mondoloni 2006-12-04 02:17:51 UTC
Created attachment 103311 [details]
my xorg.conf
Comment 13 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-12-13 16:39:50 UTC
*** Bug 158083 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 14 Sebastian Volke 2006-12-14 12:39:39 UTC
Oliver: try restarting you computer after the fglrx upgrade. I see from your dmesg, that you simply restartet the xserver, without even taking your time to modprobe -r fglrx.
Maybe this is the cause of the problems, but, of course, I'm not sure.
Comment 15 Sebastian Volke 2006-12-14 12:42:16 UTC
And, I forgot:
don't forget renaming the ebuild to ati-drivers-8.32.5, otherwise you get the 8.31.5 version, which isn't the latest one and which is also not the version this bug has been filed for. ;-)
Comment 16 Olivier Mondoloni 2006-12-14 14:09:47 UTC
I try modified ati-drivers-8.31.5.ebuild renamed ati-drivers-8.32.5.ebuild. My ati-drivers works good without error messages.

Thank you.
Comment 17 Pat Double 2006-12-15 06:03:08 UTC
Has any one successfully use software suspend, either swsusp or suspend2, with 8.32.5 ? I tried and it hung once at atomic copy and I got a kernel oops a second time. I am using 2.6.19 and suspend2 2.2.9. I have no problems with 8.30.3.
Comment 18 Scott Price 2006-12-15 06:10:01 UTC
8.32.5 wouldn't run for me.  X crashed about the time I got a login window.  I then tried to go back to my console (vesa frame buffer) and it was badly corrupted.  I had to downgrade to the 8.30 drivers.  Anyone else experience this?
Comment 19 Nico R. Wohlgemuth 2006-12-16 08:45:59 UTC
when 8.32.5 will be in portage?
Comment 20 Pat Double 2006-12-16 09:43:09 UTC
(In reply to comment #17)
> Has any one successfully use software suspend, either swsusp or suspend2, with
> 8.32.5 ? I tried and it hung once at atomic copy and I got a kernel oops a
> second time. I am using 2.6.19 and suspend2 2.2.9. I have no problems with
> 8.30.3.
> 

An update. I copied the ebuild for 8.30.3-r1 and change the SRC_URL to work with 8.32.5 and have not have troubles with suspend2. Should the 8.32.5 be based off of 8.30.3-r1? It is different than the one posted here.
Comment 21 dongxu li 2006-12-18 10:38:32 UTC
(In reply to comment #18)
> 8.32.5 wouldn't run for me.  X crashed about the time I got a login window.  I
> then tried to go back to my console (vesa frame buffer) and it was badly
> corrupted.  I had to downgrade to the 8.30 drivers.  Anyone else experience
> this?
> 

I'm even less lucky. Either 8.30 or 8.32.5 works for me. The only chance for me is the still buggy 8.31.5.

8.30 seems to be running, but I couldn't see anything on screen, not even a pointer, no error in Xorg.0.log.

8.32.5 can start, but I can not get anything beyond failsafe terminal. X crashes for all other sessions.

My card is FireGL V5250. ati is a bad choice for linux. Looks like Intel Graphic is the only choice.
Comment 22 Víctor Enríquez 2006-12-19 13:35:34 UTC
8.32.5 Working fine here on ati moility radeon 9700.
Comment 23 Thomas Meyer 2006-12-20 10:49:46 UTC
Created attachment 104450 [details, diff]
Fix compile on linux kernel version >= 2.6.20

This fixes the compilation of the ati-drivers for linux kernel version >= 2.6.20. DRM is broken within this patch because of this commit:

http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=f5738ceed46782aea7663d62cb6398eb05fc4ce0

If somebody know how to determine the address of a certain syscall please fix my patch.
Comment 24 Nicolas Riegel 2006-12-26 03:28:04 UTC
(In reply to comment #17)
> Has any one successfully use software suspend, either swsusp or suspend2, with
> 8.32.5 ? I tried and it hung once at atomic copy and I got a kernel oops a
> second time. I am using 2.6.19 and suspend2 2.2.9. I have no problems with
> 8.30.3.
> 

Suspend to ram doesn't work for me too, but suspend to disk works. I have a mobility X700, kernel 2.6.19-suspend2-r1, and 8.30.3 works well for me.
Comment 25 Nico R. Wohlgemuth 2006-12-26 06:07:17 UTC
FIXED. 8.32.5 is in portage now.
Comment 26 Jory A. Pratt 2006-12-26 07:25:08 UTC
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > I think that these patches are a better solution:
> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156876
> > 
> > I've tested this on 8.31.5 and kernel 2.6.19 and it works.
> > 
> Second that.
> Better to check for kernel version and apply Fedora patches, then to remove
> config.h includes altogether.
> 
Well as we only have such a few supported kernels in gentoo all of which are 2.6.18 atleast, the conditional patch is invalid. 
Comment 27 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-12-29 07:12:35 UTC
 25 Dec 2006; Luca Barbato <lu_zero@gentoo.org> +ati-drivers-8.32.5.ebuild:
  New version

Closing.