Bug 146774 – dev-dotnet/gtkhtml-sharp-2.16.0 - gnome-extra/gtkhtml upgrade/downgrade cycle

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Jong hun Shin 2006-09-07 19:07:26 UTC]

New Gnome 2.16 Package - new version of gtkhtml, gnome-extra/gtkhtml-3.12.0 is out, but gtkhtml-sharp-2.16.0.ebuild needs gnome-extra/gtkhtml-3.10* version yet.

on ~x86 keywords + Unmasked all gnome 2.16 related package condition,
gtkhtml-3.10.2 / gtkhtml-3.12.0 package will update competitively.
(once install gtkhtml-3.10.2 version, then "emerge -upDv world" command shows "update for gnome-extra/gtkhtml-3.12.0", when update to gtkhtml-3.12.0, emerge shows "[UD]" update  to gnome-extra/gtkhtml-3.10.2 , and vice versa- everytime.)

[Comment 1 Jong hun Shin 2006-09-07 19:15:37 UTC]

Created attachment 96357 [details]
corrected ebuild: gtkhtml-sharp-2.16.0.ebuild

I patched gtkhtml-sharp-2.16.0.ebuild, it works for me.

I just added "=gnome-extra/gtkhtml-3.12" to DEPENDS variable in this ebuilds,

here's another solution: in gtkhtml-sharp-2.16.0.ebuild:

DEPEND="${DEPEND}
        =dev-dotnet/gnome-sharp-${PV}*
        =dev-dotnet/art-sharp-${PV}*
        || (
            >=gnome-extra/gtkhtml-3.0.10*
        )"

[Comment 2 Peter Johanson (RETIRED) 2006-09-12 19:34:51 UTC]

First, these really shouldn't be doing this upgrade/downgrade cycle because they're in different slots... Once both get installed, everything should be fine. Is this not the case if you install both?

Second, this check cannot just be blindly switched like this. The configure script for the gnome-sharp-2.16.0 tarball doesn't include a check for this version, afaict, so if you install gtkhtml-sharp-2.16.0 with only 3.12.0 installed, nothing will get installed.

Can you please do two things for me? First, post the output of 'equery f gtkhtml-3.12.0' and test the actually behaviour when both 3.10.0 and 3.12.0 are installed? Thanks.

[Comment 3 Peter Johanson (RETIRED) 2006-09-12 20:03:41 UTC]

Ok, nevermind. Talked to genstef who pointed out that 3.12.0 is actually the same SLOT as 3.10.0, and provides the right .pc file. Fixed in CVS, marking this bug FIXED. Thanks for the report.

[Comment 4 Jong hun Shin 2006-09-12 20:53:22 UTC]

Created attachment 96852 [details]
Output of "equery f =gnome-extra/gtkhtml-3.12.0" commands

[Comment 5 Jong hun Shin 2006-09-12 20:54:58 UTC]

Created attachment 96853 [details]
Output of "equery f =gnome-extra/gtkhtml-3.10.2"

[Comment 6 Jong hun Shin 2006-09-12 20:58:18 UTC]

as uploaded two file lists, they've almost same filelists.

First, I unmerged gnome-extra/gtkhtml-3.12.0 cleanly.
(with erase all symbolic links.)

after 'emerge =gnome-extra/gtkhtml-3.10.2',

"emerge -upDv world" commands show this:
----
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating world dependencies... done!
[ebuild     U ] gnome-extra/gtkhtml-3.12.0 [3.10.2] USE="-debug -static%" 0 kB 
---

why show "Upgrade" flag? If it can be coexist, It should be "New" flag?

btw, i emerged new gtkhtml-3.12.0 by "emerge =gnome-extra/gtkhtml-3.12.0"

after emerging, "emerge -upDv world" show this:
----
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating world dependencies... done!
[ebuild     UD] gnome-extra/gtkhtml-3.10.2 [3.12.0] USE="-debug (-static%)" 0 kB 
----
/usr/lib/mono/gac/gtkhtml-sharp/2.16.0.0__35e10195dab3c99f/gtkhtml-sharp.dll.config file include this line:
<dllmap dll="gtkhtml-3.0" target="libgtkhtml-3.8.so.15"/>

libgtkhtml-3.8.so.15 is symbolic links to libgtkhtml-3.8.so.15.3.9 file,

gtkhtml-3.10.2 lib shows:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 645512 2006-09-13 12:37 libgtkhtml-3.8.so.15.3.9*

gtkhtml-3.12.0 lib shows:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     24 2006-09-13 12:48 libgtkhtml-3.8.so.15 -> libgtkhtml-3.8.so.15.3.9*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 647208 2006-09-13 12:48 libgtkhtml-3.8.so.15.3.9*

IMHO, it has same ABI versions, and those filenames are same, so these cannot be coexist version 3.10.2 and 3.12.0, I think.

[Comment 7 Jong hun Shin 2006-09-12 21:06:09 UTC]

(In reply to comment #3)
> Ok, nevermind. Talked to genstef who pointed out that 3.12.0 is actually the
> same SLOT as 3.10.0, and provides the right .pc file. Fixed in CVS, marking
> this bug FIXED. Thanks for the report.
> 

Oh, I'm late. :-) 

After receiving your posts by e-mail, I tested again without seeing bugzilla page.

My Webbrowser didn't clean old cache of this page, so I've seen your new postings after I post 3 Attachment/message.

thanks. :)

[Comment 8 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-09-13 00:15:23 UTC]

*** Bug 147410 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 9 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-11-01 02:43:20 UTC]

*** Bug 153655 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 10 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-01-21 18:35:31 UTC]

*** Bug 163089 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 11 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-01-21 18:37:43 UTC]

Reopen to get this fixed properly...

[Comment 12 Jurek Bartuszek (RETIRED) 2007-07-27 09:57:13 UTC]

dev-dotnet/gtkhtml-sharp-2.16.0 is stable, closing