Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 141635 - sys-cluster/pvfs2 fails with as-needed
Summary: sys-cluster/pvfs2 fails with as-needed
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 174670
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Cluster Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: as-needed
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2006-07-24 15:09 UTC by Stefan Schweizer (RETIRED)
Modified: 2010-09-10 19:00 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
config.log (config.log,79.98 KB, text/plain)
2006-07-24 15:09 UTC, Stefan Schweizer (RETIRED) 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Stefan Schweizer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-07-24 15:09:15 UTC 
checking for DB_DIRTY_READ flag... yes
checking for DB_BUFFER_SMALL error... yes
checking if server lib needs -lrt... configure: error: failed attempting to link lio_listio

!!! Please attach the following file when filing a report to bugs.gentoo.org:
!!! /files/tmp/portage/pvfs2-1.5.1/work/pvfs2-1.5.1/config.log
Comment 1 Stefan Schweizer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-07-24 15:09:39 UTC 
Created attachment 92648 [details]
config.log
Comment 2 Donnie Berkholz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-09-24 21:30:13 UTC 
Got a patch?
Comment 3 Stefan Schweizer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-02-11 11:21:02 UTC 
no patch here. Tried but failed
Comment 4 Stefan Schweizer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-03-24 09:47:28 UTC 
this ebuild has not been updated in gentoo in a while. Can you please p.mask and remove the ebuild?
Comment 5 Donnie Berkholz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-03-26 07:33:49 UTC 
(In reply to comment #4)
> this ebuild has not been updated in gentoo in a while. Can you please p.mask
> and remove the ebuild?

Why? Surely not because it's broken with some unsupported LDFLAGS?
Comment 6 Stefan Schweizer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-03-26 08:33:24 UTC 
Remove it because this version is old and unsupported upstream. Doesnt make much sense to keep it in portage when version bumps dont make it.
Comment 7 Donnie Berkholz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-03-26 17:24:23 UTC 
I have been working on and off to get a new version in, but the build system gets worse and worse, especially when trying to figure out how to fix this bug. I would prefer to keep an older version in until then.
Comment 8 Stefan Schweizer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-04-25 09:24:49 UTC 
this is being taken care of in the new ebuild in bug 174670

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 174670 ***