the attached backerupper.tar.gz contains the backerupper-0.5a.ebuild and the
the patch is needed to compile the source and contains an exampleconfig - i
didn't want to change anything in the original packet.
BackerUpper is a simple, easy to configure backup utility that will perform
monthly full backups and daily incremental backups. Backups are created in the
zip or bzip2 file format.
backerupper is written by
Kevin L. Ellis (firstname.lastname@example.org)
the patch and the ebuild is from me,
Sebastian Goth (email@example.com)
i suggest app-admin/backerupper - donno why :)
Created attachment 7295 [details]
backerupper-0.5a.ebuild (New Package)
As far as I can tell, this ebuild is empty...
It's a text file that just has '1042564373' in it. Could you please resubmit both of these as plaintext?
Also, that patch looks like a full C file rather than a diff - is this intentional?
seezer: please attach your ebuild as plain text.
avenj: would you like to join app-backup?
I just create ebuild for this app, becouse previous ebuild deliverer propably
Good category for that app will be app-backup.
Created attachment 67823 [details]
Created attachment 67824 [details]
The requested URL /backerupper/ was not found on this server.
Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.
BackerUpper is still available but via the following link http://www.skyloom.com/docs/backerupper.html
In regards to the date when the bug was opened and now, and since the latest update on the website is in 2002, I am wondering it is relevant to put this in the portage since the dev stream seems to be stuck.
If yes, I can make the ebuild for
If no, can we close the bug?