Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 136313 - [QA] Files were installed with user portage
Summary: [QA] Files were installed with user portage
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Portage Development
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High minor (vote)
Assignee: Portage team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: InVCS
: 136876 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks: 136244 137445
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2006-06-10 12:16 UTC by Paweł Hajdan, Jr. (RETIRED)
Modified: 2006-06-20 16:59 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Paweł Hajdan, Jr. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-06-10 12:16:52 UTC
After installing postfix-2.2.5 I get messages like this in log:

* QA Notice: Files were installed with user portage!
* QA Notice: Files were installed with group portage!

Portage 2.1 (default-linux/amd64/2006.0, gcc-3.4.5, glibc-2.3.6-r3, 2.6.16-gentoo-r9 x86_64)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.16-gentoo-r9 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+
Gentoo Base System version 1.6.14
ccache version 2.3 [enabled]
dev-lang/python:     2.4.2
dev-python/pycrypto: 2.0.1-r5
dev-util/ccache:     2.3
dev-util/confcache:  [Not Present]
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.17
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.59-r7
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r1
sys-devel/binutils:  2.16.1-r2
sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.3.13-r2
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.22
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.11-r2
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CBUILD="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-march=athlon64 -O2 -pipe"
CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/3.5/env /usr/kde/3.5/share/config /usr/kde/3.5/shutdown /usr/lib/X11/xkb /usr/share/config"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/env.d /etc/gconf /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/splash /etc/terminfo"
CXXFLAGS="-march=athlon64 -O2 -pipe"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoconfig ccache collision-protect distlocks fixpackages metadata-transfer parallel-fetch sandbox sfperms strict userfetch userpriv usersandbox"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://ftp.belnet.be/mirror/rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo/ http://gentoo.zie.pg.gda.pl http://gentoo.intergenia.de http://gentoo.prz.rzeszow.pl"
LANG="en_US.utf8"
LC_ALL="en_US.utf8"
LINGUAS="en pl"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS="--recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times --compress --force --whole-file --delete --delete-after --stats --timeout=180 --exclude='/distfiles' --exclude='/local' --exclude='/packages'"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.europe.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="amd64 X acl acpi alsa apache2 arts audiofile avi berkdb bitmap-fonts browserplugin bzip2 cdparanoia cdr cli cracklib crypt cups curl dbus dri dvd dvdr emboss encode exif expat ffmpeg firefox foomaticdb fortran ftp gdbm gif gimp glut gmp gstreamer gtk gtk2 hal imlib ipv6 isdnlog java javascript jpeg kde lzw lzw-tiff mad mng mono mozilla mp3 mpeg ncurses nls nptl nsplugin nvidia ogg oggvorbis opengl pam pcre pdf pdflib perl php png pppd python qt quicktime readline reflection samba scanner sdl session spell spl ssl tcpd tiff truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts unicode usb utf8 vorbis xorg xpm xv zip zlib elibc_glibc kernel_linux linguas_en linguas_pl userland_GNU"
Unset:  CTARGET, EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS, INSTALL_MASK, LDFLAGS, PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS
Comment 1 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-06-10 14:03:29 UTC
Re-assigning to portage folks... this is pretty much normal w/ FEATURES="userpriv", so the warning is somewhat questionable.
Comment 2 Zac Medico gentoo-dev 2006-06-10 14:14:55 UTC
I think we should just drop this particular QA warning.  It's never valid to install files with portage uid/gid.  Why not just map the uid/gid and be done with  it?  Anything else is more work for questionable benefit.
Comment 3 solar (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-06-10 15:35:25 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> I think we should just drop this particular QA warning.  It's never valid to
> install files with portage uid/gid.  Why not just map the uid/gid and be done
> with  it?  Anything else is more work for questionable benefit.
> 

Sounds good.
Comment 4 Zac Medico gentoo-dev 2006-06-10 16:05:26 UTC
This is fixed in svn r3488.
Comment 5 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-06-15 04:24:15 UTC
*** Bug 136876 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Zac Medico gentoo-dev 2006-06-16 10:03:12 UTC
This has been released in 2.1.1_pre1.