Beesoft Commander is a file manager (like Norton Commander) for Linux. It is based on Qt-GUI. I've tested it on x86 and it works fine for me. Can't say anything about other platforms.
Created attachment 74388 [details] bsc-2.01.3.ebuild
Created attachment 74613 [details] bsc-2.02.ebuild
Comment on attachment 74613 [details] bsc-2.02.ebuild added new version of bsc
Created attachment 75385 [details] bsc-2.03.ebuild
Created attachment 76977 [details] bsc-2.06.ebuild new version:)
Created attachment 77561 [details] bsc-2.08.ebuild New Ebuild for new version. Additionaly I've created a desktop file so applcation installs into KDE menu without problems.
Created attachment 77562 [details] desktop file patch Desktop fle patch for ebuild
Created attachment 77563 [details] About box patch file About box patch file.
Comment on attachment 77561 [details] bsc-2.08.ebuild New ebuild for new version
Created attachment 77581 [details, diff] bsc-desktop_file.patch Corrections in .desktop file(thanks to Przemyslaw Maciag)
Created attachment 77582 [details, diff] bsc-about.patch Little correction.
Created attachment 77583 [details] bsc-2.08.ebuild Missing quotation marks
Created attachment 79102 [details] bsc-2.12.ebuild Version bump.
Created attachment 79103 [details] bsc-about.patch As version of bsc changed there was a little change in about box.
Created attachment 84770 [details] bsc-2.18.1.ebuild Updated to work with new feature: language files in new location
There is a new version 2.22 available.
(In reply to comment #16) > There is a new version 2.22 available. > It seems to me that it is enough to rename the latest ebuild to bsc-2.22.ebuild and it works :)
Created attachment 89471 [details] bsc-2.26 ebuild bsc-2.23 ebuild. Not using the patches, as they are not really needed.
http://gentoo-sunrise.org/svn/sunrise/app-misc/bsc/
http://gentoo-sunrise.org/svn/reviewed/app-misc/bsc/
(In reply to comment #20) > http://gentoo-sunrise.org/svn/reviewed/app-misc/bsc/ > please add ~amd64 keyword - bsc was compuiled fine on my ~amd64 machine and sems to work corectly...
Created attachment 237955 [details] Current Sunrise ebuild for bsc
I've recently bumped the bsc ebuild to 4.1.0 and now I see that a similar ebuild coexists in qting-edge overlay. Furthermore, I personally think that my ebuild is cleaner and less hackish, while the qting-edge one seems like a trivial bump of the old ebuild once being in Sunrise. I personally think that there's no real reason to keep two different ebuild for the same package in two quite widespread overlays. Yngwin, could you state your opinion on the topic?
As I am no longer directly involved with Gentoo, my opinion doesn't matter. Please contact the Gentoo Qt team <qt@gentoo.org>, which I'm CC'ing on this bug, about this issue. They are maintaining the qting-edge overlay. My personal opinion is that qtfm is much more promising.
The Qt team is no longer interested in this package (whose last release was in 2008 btw), thus I'm removing qt@g.o from CC and deleting app-misc/bsc from qt overlay.
Hello, everyone. It seems that at least one ebuild related to this bug exists in the Sunrise overlay at the moment. However, I have to regretfully announce that after a long inactivity period the Sunrise project has been discontinued and the related overlay will be eventually removed. For this reason, I'd like to ask you to reevaluate the ebuilds and consider moving them. If you'd like to maintain a package from Sunrise in Gentoo, please take a look at our Proxy Maintainers [1] project. Please make sure to take ebuilds from the unreviewed developer Sunrise repository [2] rather than the -reviewed one, since the latter has not been updated for over a year. While at it, please note that: 1. Adding a package to Gentoo requires declaring yourself as an active maintainer for it. All bugs regarding the package will be assigned to you, and you will be expected to maintain it. 2. Some packages may not be suitable for addition anymore. While there's no strong rules that would prevent you from adding a package, it may be a bad idea to add old-unmaintained packages that will shortly result in a large number of bugs reported with no solution. If that is the case, please close the bug as RESOLVED/OBSOLETE to make it easier to find packages worth adding. 3. Some of the bugs were already closed as WONTFIX/OBSOLETE/... while the relevant ebuild was kept in Sunrise. If you disagree with the original decision, you still can add the ebuild via proxy-maint. 4. Pleaes note that many of the Sunrise ebuilds are old and may be buggy. If you decide to move them, please make sure to update/clean them up. The proxy-maint team will also review your ebuilds, therefore making sure they land in Gentoo in good quality. Once again, thank you for your contribution. We hope that you will still want to contribute to Gentoo, through proxy-maint or otherwise. [1]:https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers [2]:https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/sunrise.git/
