Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 113460 - gnome-bluetooth-0.6.0 compile failure: data/Makefile.am:14: GCONF_SCHEMAS_INSTALL does not appear in AM_CONDITIONAL
Summary: gnome-bluetooth-0.6.0 compile failure: data/Makefile.am:14: GCONF_SCHEMAS_INS...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] GNOME (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Alastair Tse (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 113834 113851 115661 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-11-24 05:54 UTC by Ed Catmur
Modified: 2006-02-01 03:52 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
Patch against 0.6.0.ebuild, making it use automake 1.5 (gnome-bluetooth-0.6.0.ebuild.automake-1.5.patch,533 bytes, patch)
2005-12-23 13:54 UTC, Alexander Skwar
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ed Catmur 2005-11-24 05:54:41 UTC
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking gnome-bluetooth-0.6.0.tar.bz2 to
/var/tmp/portage/gnome-bluetooth-0.6.0/work
 * Applying gnome-bluetooth-0.5.1-obex_xfer_rate.patch ...                [ ok ]
data/Makefile.am:14: GCONF_SCHEMAS_INSTALL does not appear in AM_CONDITIONAL
Comment 1 Ed Catmur 2005-11-24 07:12:40 UTC
This seems to be because it is packaged with aclocal-1.4 and automake-1.4.

Switching the ebuild to use 

    aclocal-1.5 || die
    automake-1.5 -a || die
    autoconf || die

makes it work fine.
Comment 2 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-28 12:32:50 UTC
*** Bug 113834 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-28 15:51:00 UTC
*** Bug 113851 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Tiziano Müller (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-07 08:19:14 UTC
@Ed: You're right.

In my ebuild, I did the following:

 export WANT_AUTOMAKE="1.5"
 libtoolize --force --copy || die
 aclocal || die
 automake -a || die
 autoconf || die

(with the variable, as it is done in openldap)


Comment 5 Alexander Skwar 2005-12-13 13:19:46 UTC
It would be nice, if a -r1 could be released, which incorporates the fix
mentioned in comment #4.
Comment 6 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-15 08:01:29 UTC
*** Bug 115661 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Alexander Skwar 2005-12-23 13:54:53 UTC
Created attachment 75409 [details, diff]
Patch against 0.6.0.ebuild, making it use automake 1.5

Please apply this patch and release a -r1!
Comment 8 Sebastian Bergmann (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-28 01:22:28 UTC
I can confirm that the attached patch resolves the problem.
Comment 9 Magnus Anderson 2006-01-10 03:27:47 UTC
This does not work for me...

You should update your `aclocal.m4' by running aclocal.
automake-1.5: configure.in: required file `./py-compile' not found
automake-1.5: configure.in: required file `./depcomp' not found
Comment 10 Magnus Anderson 2006-01-10 03:29:41 UTC
(In reply to comment #9)
> This does not work for me...
> 
> You should update your `aclocal.m4' by running aclocal.
> automake-1.5: configure.in: required file `./py-compile' not found
> automake-1.5: configure.in: required file `./depcomp' not found
> 

Sorry, did work, my fault.
Comment 11 Stian Skjelstad 2006-01-12 00:46:31 UTC
(In reply to comment #9)
> This does not work for me...
> 
> You should update your `aclocal.m4' by running aclocal.
> automake-1.5: configure.in: required file `./py-compile' not found
> automake-1.5: configure.in: required file `./depcomp' not found

For the folks who got this far, add the -a flag to automake to copy in the "missing" files.

Can we see a -r1 of this ebuild?
Comment 12 Christian Reiser 2006-01-25 00:16:46 UTC
Sorry, i am still new to portage. How to apply the patch without getting an digest verification error? When will the -r1 be released?
Comment 13 Jens Svalgaard Kohrt 2006-01-26 02:12:08 UTC
Me too! It only works by using the patch from #7. :)
Comment 14 Simon Stelling (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-01 03:52:05 UTC
i came across this when applying Octavio's patch for bug 108880, should be fixed now