Bug 107368 – courier-authlib compile error

• Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 105711
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Alex Bird 2005-09-27 01:42:53 UTC]

There is a problem with compiling courier-authlib >0.56 version, but with .56
and less are all right

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Just attemped to compile courier-imap
2.All version of courier-authlib >.56 don't wanna assembly
3.

Actual Results:  
Linking libauthuserdb.la
Compiling authpam.c
Compiling preauthpam.c
Linking libauthpam.la
/usr/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu-nm: libmisc.a: File format not recognized
/usr/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu-nm: libmisc.a: File format not recognized
/usr/lib/libshadow.a: member /usr/lib/libshadow.a(libmisc.a) in archive is not
an object
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [libauthpam.la] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/var/tmp/portage/courier-authlib-0.57-r1/work/courier-authlib-0.57'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/var/tmp/portage/courier-authlib-0.57-r1/work/courier-authlib-0.57'
make: *** [all] Error 2

Expected Results:  
bin files of courier-imap =)

[Comment 1 Alex Bird 2005-09-27 01:45:04 UTC]

monkey ~ # emerge -pv courier-imap

These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild     U ] net-libs/courier-authlib-0.57-r1 [0.56] +berkdb +crypt -debug
+gdbm +ldap +mysql +pam -postgres 0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] net-mail/courier-imap-4.0.4  +berkdb -debug -fam +gdbm -ipv6
+nls (-selinux) 3,082 kB

monkey ~ #

[Comment 2 Alex Bird 2005-09-27 01:50:06 UTC]

monkey ~ # cat /etc/make.conf | grep -v ^# | grep -v -i use
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=pentium4 -fomit-frame-pointer"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86"
monkey ~ #

[Comment 3 Duke 2005-10-03 11:45:59 UTC]

This is a dupe of Bug #105711.  There is a workaround and a solution suggested
there.

[Comment 4 Alex Bird 2005-10-03 11:51:01 UTC]

I could solve this problem by puting away berkdb in USE.

[Comment 5 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2005-10-05 01:41:16 UTC]

Can you try w/ shadow-4.0.7-r4?

[Comment 6 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2005-10-05 03:35:04 UTC]

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 105711 ***

[Comment 7 Alex Bird 2005-10-05 05:57:37 UTC]

thanks a lot!!!!!!!!!