Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 104443 - several files are part of no package
Summary: several files are part of no package
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 71265
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Unspecified (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-08-31 20:05 UTC by Evan Teran
Modified: 2005-09-01 15:42 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
this is the script i used to find the files (check_file.sh,1.46 KB, text/plain)
2005-08-31 20:07 UTC, Evan Teran
Details
improved version of the script (excludes /proc, /sys, /dev, /usr/portage, and /usr/src/linux) (check_file.sh,1.60 KB, text/plain)
2005-08-31 20:27 UTC, Evan Teran
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Evan Teran 2005-08-31 20:05:05 UTC
i wrote a small script to find binaries which are not in a package (will be
attached) and discovered that there were several files which are part of the
base system, but belong to no package.  I woudl imagine that every file which i
did not create or was not created as a side effect of running a program should
be included in some package (many of these seem to fall under base-layout).

anyway some examples:



/etc/init.d/serial
/bin/hostid (used to be in coreutils?)

(the following may be due to me running a gcc 3.4.4 system which is unstable as
of writing this, but could possible be left overs from gcc 3.3.5 not properly
unmerging entirely)
/usr/bin/c++
/usr/bin/cpp
/usr/bin/f77
/usr/bin/g++
/usr/bin/g++32
/usr/bin/g77
/usr/bin/gcc32
/usr/bin/i386-pc-linux-gnu-c++
/usr/bin/i386-pc-linux-gnu-g++
/usr/bin/i386-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
/usr/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu-c++
/usr/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu-g++
/usr/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu-g++32
/usr/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu-g77
/usr/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
/usr/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc32

and lots of .keep files which IMHO shoudl be part of the baselayout package.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.




Portage 2.0.51.22-r2 (default-linux/x86/2005.1, gcc-3.4.4, glibc-2.3.5-r1,
2.6.12.5 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.12.5 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 2.00GHz
Gentoo Base System version 1.6.13
distcc 2.18.3 i686-pc-linux-gnu (protocols 1 and 2) (default port 3632) [disabled]
ccache version 2.3 [enabled]
dev-lang/python:     2.3.5
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.12
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.59-r6
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6
sys-devel/binutils:  2.15.92.0.2-r10
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.18-r1
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.11-r2
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CBUILD="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-march=pentium-m -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -pipe"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3.4/env
/usr/kde/3.4/share/config /usr/kde/3.4/shutdown /usr/kde/3/share/config
/usr/lib/X11/xkb /usr/share/config /usr/share/texmf/dvipdfm/config/
/usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/ /usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/config/
/usr/share/texmf/tex/platex/config/ /usr/share/texmf/xdvi/ /var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-march=pentium-m -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -pipe"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoconfig ccache distlocks sandbox sfperms strict"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://distfiles.gentoo.org
http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/gentoo"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.us.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="x86 X acl acpi alsa arts avi berkdb bitmap-fonts cdr chroot crypt cscope
cups curl debugger doc dvd dvdread emboss encode esd ethereal fam fbcon flac
foomaticdb fortran gd gdbm gif gpm gtk gtk2 imagemagick imap imlib innodb ipv6
java jpeg kde kerberos ldap libg++ libwww mad mikmod mmx motif mp3 mpeg mysql
ncurses nls nptl nptlonly odbc ogg oggvorbis opengl oss pam pcmcia pdflib perl
png pnp python qt quicktime readline samba sasl sdl skey slang smime snmp
softmmu spell sse sse2 ssl svga tcltk tcpd tetex tiff transcode truetype
truetype-fonts type1-fonts unicode usb userlocales vorbis wifi wxwindows xine
xml2 xmms xprint xv zlib userland_GNU kernel_linux elibc_glibc"
Unset:  ASFLAGS, CTARGET, LANG, LC_ALL, LDFLAGS, LINGUAS, PORTDIR_OVERLAY
Comment 1 Evan Teran 2005-08-31 20:07:37 UTC
Created attachment 67378 [details]
this is the script i used to find the files

"./check_file.sh --help" for help but is is pretty basic usage.

for example, to look for files which no owner in /usr/ and recurse 2 dirs deep

./check_file.sh --dir /usr --maxdepth 2

(note it doesn't like the file /usr/bin/[ since bash thinks it's part of a test
expression, so that will show up as having no owner as a false positive)
Comment 2 Evan Teran 2005-08-31 20:10:37 UTC
i also noticed recently that koffice which I used to have installed did not
entirely uninstall properly leaving behind several files in /usr/lib

/usr/lib/karbon.la has no owner!
/usr/lib/kchart.la has no owner!
/usr/lib/kformulamain.la has no owner!
/usr/lib/kivio.la has no owner!
/usr/lib/koshell.la has no owner!
/usr/lib/kpresenter.la has no owner!
/usr/lib/kspread.la has no owner!
/usr/lib/kudesigner.la has no owner!
/usr/lib/kugar.la has no owner!
/usr/lib/kword.la has no owner!
Comment 3 Evan Teran 2005-08-31 20:27:28 UTC
Created attachment 67380 [details]
improved version of the script (excludes /proc, /sys, /dev, /usr/portage, and /usr/src/linux)
Comment 4 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-09-01 15:42:34 UTC
I guess there're several scripts floating around identifying stale files. Up to
know Portage checks for matching mtime
Comment 5 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-09-01 15:42:34 UTC
I guess there're several scripts floating around identifying stale files. Up to
know Portage checks for matching mtime¹ before deleting files. Then there is a
small bug regarding symlinks². Last but possible not least Portage doesn't care
about the life time of CONFIG_PROTECTed files³

All known issues, so I'm treating this as dupe.


[1] Bug 71265
[2] Bug 59593
[3] Bug 8423


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 71265 ***