A new version of mplayerplug-in is out 3.05 Since at least the 6th of Aug. (the web site says 8 of Aug. but the tarball is there). Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3.
Created attachment 65284 [details] mplayerplug-in-3.05.ebuild This is an ebuild for the new version of mplayerplug-in. It includes new use flags which may well need to be renamed to be more conformant with existing use flags, but I chose these names so as to not conflict with existing use flags. The ebuild itself works, although mplayerplug-in is fairly buggy as far as i can tell. -cc
(In reply to comment #1) > Created an attachment (id=65284) [edit] > mplayerplug-in-3.05.ebuild > > This is an ebuild for the new version of mplayerplug-in. It includes new use > flags which may well need to be renamed to be more conformant with existing use > flags, but I chose these names so as to not conflict with existing use flags. > The ebuild itself works, although mplayerplug-in is fairly buggy as far as i > can tell. > > -cc You could look here #100809, the problem is not with mplayerplug-in (works like charm for me), but with the dynamic linking.
Created attachment 65965 [details] ebuild for 3.05 My personal preference is not to include individual use flags like this. For high level stuff like this I think inclusive is usually the right way to go. If people want a trim system, they aren't going to have mozilla in the first place. If we HAVE to have individual tuning like this, I would prefer "no..." versions of the USE flags. That way people get the functionality by default, and have to request to turn it off. Anyways, I've attached an ebuild. This also incorporates a change that doesn't require gecko-sdk installed if you are on x86.
Please attach unified diffs against the latest in-portage version instead of full ebuilds. Oh, and please attach them to the proper bugs :) *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 100809 ***
If it was just a couple of lines that changed, then yes. But considering the unified diff is larger than the new ebuild, that's definitely not what I would find useful.
