| Summary: | Ebuild for IceWM-1.2.3pre1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Craig Callender <craig> |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) <seemant> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | craig |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | 1.4_rc1 | ||
| Hardware: | x86 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: |
The ebuild for IceWM-1.2.3pre1
The new icewm-gcc31-gentoo.patch The aapm-gentoo.patch needed because there is a spare parentesis The new ebuild which correctly uses the MY_P variable. |
||
Created attachment 5184 [details]
The ebuild for IceWM-1.2.3pre1
Created attachment 5185 [details, diff]
The new icewm-gcc31-gentoo.patch
Created attachment 5186 [details, diff]
The aapm-gentoo.patch needed because there is a spare parentesis
Created attachment 5187 [details]
The new ebuild which correctly uses the MY_P variable.
This ebuild correctly uses the MY_P variable rather than over-writing P. Also
is named correctly with the _pre1.
Just for reference. The bug for the aapm.cc patch I posted is bug #630806 oh IceWM's bug list. you figured out the _pre stuff anyway, well done :) you've made this an easy one for me :) thanks much, added into portage. |
Here is the ebuild for icewm-1.2.3pre1. I could not name the ebuild icewm-1.2.3pre1.ebuild as it kept complaining that it was not a valid name. If you could tell me if this is possible I would appreciate it. My work around was that I declared the variable ${P} to be ${P}pre1. That seems to make everything work out well. I just figure it's better if people know this is only the pre-release. Also, added support for GtkSpell and put the optional dependencies in alphabetical order (I just like them better that way *grin*). Oh. I also had to add a patch for the aapm.cc file. He added one to many parenthesis. I will tell Mark about this and hopefully he will fix it. Also had to modify the gcc31 patch. He had changed some of the code and it wouldn't apply. I don't have a 3.1 machine so I don't know if it still needs to be in there.